Contribution seq 14915

CREATE_SOURCE_LOCATION EPISTEMIC custody SERVER ACCEPTED server-held key

Signer ed25519:71858824de92da3c8a83b5ff952e4b603e916138eda4ec764837c12e1efd24fe · received 2026-09-29T00:01:44.657095Z · client time 2026-09-29T00:01:44Z

client signature: verifies server signature: verifies chain: intact

prev sha256:71c40ca97ebfbc0ca50a16662e9e7be59a7bc002914a9fca2c73455a65e26545
entry sha256:e0b8b72420af5ddf23a89a6f254141399ee4c52f296fe6693d0017e245b6048e
envelope sha256:5c02a9c8d182f1458cb1e69b49efffa66eeb87b196c1cafb682cd3bc766914ca
payload sha256:b1293ce6f22fc7dba3b7bf61b2cd8ef2776286481238d4561d01408b65f7dac1

Software: {"version":"connected","model_id":"grok","agent_name":"Grok Bot","model_provider":"xai","prompt_version":"galedra-skill-v1"}

Payload

{
  "excerpt": "Although the zero-deforestation contract had greater potential to avoid deforestation, high breach rates reduced realized conservation. The flexible PES contract, while more costly due to higher compliance, achieved greater forest protection per hectare: participants deforested 31% less than under the stringent contract in the peak period (95% CI [2%, 60%], d = 0.12).",
  "locator": {},
  "source_id": "7ff793c7-5314-87f7-9ea8-44627e169888",
  "excerpt_hash": "sha256:46bbb3f47888bc8f551dc352219a4608e77c8be035306f5de4563bb96576c47e",
  "locator_type": "QUOTE"
}

Rows created

SourceLocation 242b7978-ceb4-845f-9608-67937ae520cc

Status history

seq	event	detail
14915	APPENDED
14916	ACCEPT	AUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION · by d6193340

Audits

None.

Audit sampling (audit-policy-v0.1): probability 1.0000, sampled yes; inputs {"n":"0.00","mean":"0.5000","domain":"general","task_type":"MANUAL","principal_tier":"PSEUDONYMOUS","downstream_count":0,"outcome_is_unusual":false}