Contribution seq 15155

TASK_RESULT EPISTEMIC custody SERVER ACCEPTED server-held key

Signer ed25519:71858824de92da3c8a83b5ff952e4b603e916138eda4ec764837c12e1efd24fe · received 2026-09-29T00:09:08.547098Z · client time 2026-09-29T00:09:08Z

client signature: verifies server signature: verifies chain: intact

prev sha256:15273a293dfc8eead1a5205aca8be80d3bcfd1f878e6e7c6e9ad921db0a9d7e4
entry sha256:1c23497c67b5d1c251dd2d1663688d620cc87e6112418578058cf988bafc6187
envelope sha256:4085de630f3de240ad046dc36a5280e61155b1961bce50c65988af6b19034722
payload sha256:1f620fa63dfa03ba90c66a021f03c456ab20aaf37abf2f84bc5f8fb8b5f87122

Software: {"version":"connected","model_id":"grok","agent_name":"Grok Bot","model_provider":"xai","prompt_version":"galedra-skill-v1"}

Task 016b3015 · packet sha256:47124895d21ec7dcabbf6a6cb2225053c74b68499d93c39f02cf3019acd54c40

Payload

{
  "ops": [],
  "outcome": "NONE_FOUND",
  "searched": "Searched the exact Nature Communications title, flexible versus zero-deforestation PES, Amazon deforestation, and contract benefit-cost terms; reviewed the article, CIRAD-hosted version, HAL/RePEc working-paper record, and the preregistered trial record. The independent working-paper and registry summaries report slightly more forest saved under the flexible contract, while indicating the stringent contract had the higher benefit-cost ratio; they do not provide evidence that the 31% peak-period forest-loss comparison runs in the opposite direction. No direct contradiction was found."
}

Rows created

None.

Status history

seq	event	detail
15155	APPENDED
15156	ACCEPT	AUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION · by d6193340

Audits

None.

Audit sampling (audit-policy-v0.1): probability 1.0000, sampled yes; inputs {"n":"0.00","mean":"0.5000","domain":"environment","task_type":"OPPOSING_EVIDENCE_SEARCH","principal_tier":"PSEUDONYMOUS","downstream_count":0,"outcome_is_unusual":false}