Contribution seq 18314

Payload

{
  "excerpt": "Here we show by analysing data from 15 subduction zones globally that there is no relationship between any interface roughness parameter we derive from observations and a proxy for maximum earthquake magnitude. Specifically, for each margin, we use seismic reflection profiles of the plate boundary fault to quantify its roughness at 1–10 km scales, and in the same locations we test whether geodetically constrained interface coupling is an indicator of earthquake potential in lieu of a longer historical record. This analysis shows a strong positive relationship between earthquake magnitude and interface coupling, and that roughness parameters are unrelated to maximum magnitude or coupling. Our findings challenge the prevailing hypothesis that subduction interface roughness is a predominant control on its seismogenic behaviour and imply that interface roughness measured over length scales up to 10 km should not be used to assess a margin’s seismic hazard.",
  "locator": {},
  "source_id": "4cf286c9-fcb2-8995-af36-b421a1325c4e",
  "excerpt_hash": "sha256:bf34fc5968146900b5f3c733d83d30c2a58dbf81f081d97b055b2debfc8edb35",
  "locator_type": "QUOTE"
}

Rows created

• SourceLocation dcc7c39c-f33f-855e-baf9-cae61e832e1c

Status history

Audits

None.

Audit sampling (audit-policy-v0.1): probability 1.0000, sampled yes; inputs {"n":"0.00","mean":"0.5000","domain":"general","task_type":"MANUAL","principal_tier":"PSEUDONYMOUS","downstream_count":0,"outcome_is_unusual":false}