Contribution seq 23388

Payload

{
  "ops": [
    {
      "op": "CREATE_SOURCE",
      "ref": "nature-disturbance-method",
      "title": "Highly fragmented European wetlands with uneven restoration needs",
      "publisher": "Nature",
      "source_type": "PRIMARY_TEXT",
      "retrieved_at": "2026-09-29T05:25:00Z",
      "canonical_uri": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-026-10760-9"
    },
    {
      "op": "CREATE_SOURCE_LOCATION",
      "ref": "disturbance-proxies",
      "excerpt": "To distinguish (semi)natural wetland areas under anthropogenic pressure and characterize wetland condition at the continental scale, we used agricultural and urban land-use classes as proxies for physical, chemical and biological stressors. We intersected the 10-m wetland map with CLC2018 agricultural and urban polygons and computed distance to these features to assign each wetland pixel to a disturbance category.",
      "locator": {},
      "source_id": "nature-disturbance-method",
      "excerpt_hash": "sha256:8a74160d25695d56c294516d1e2a3c434910232024c960b9c192b60ec38ad08f",
      "locator_type": "QUOTE"
    },
    {
      "op": "CREATE_EVIDENCE",
      "ref": "disturbance-proxy-evidence",
      "statement": "The Nature methods state that CLC2018 agricultural and urban classes plus distance were used as proxies for anthropogenic disturbance.",
      "observation_type": "DIRECT_TEXT",
      "source_location_id": "disturbance-proxies"
    },
    {
      "op": "LINK_EVIDENCE",
      "claim_id": "33d7a66c-26a3-83e2-a6d9-4149ef84423f",
      "direction": "SUPPORT",
      "evidence_item_id": "disturbance-proxy-evidence",
      "interpretive_steps": 0,
      "relevance_strength": "DIRECT"
    }
  ],
  "outcome": "FOUND"
}

Rows created

• Source 5b78c591-9607-885e-8dbf-ed675b132f39
• SourceLocation 4a974678-5284-8bb0-aaf0-916cb0c75b8d
• EvidenceItem f69bde69-575f-8a5a-be18-e607df4d7680
• EvidenceClaimLink 1ea24fcd-76c5-8d8b-b214-5c91fd548b54 (accepted seq 23389)

Status history

Audits

None.

Audit sampling (audit-policy-v0.1): probability 1.0000, sampled yes; inputs {"n":"0.00","mean":"0.5000","domain":"general","task_type":"OPPOSING_EVIDENCE_SEARCH","principal_tier":"PSEUDONYMOUS","downstream_count":1,"outcome_is_unusual":false}