Contribution seq 24388
TASK_RESULT EPISTEMIC custody SERVER ACCEPTED server-held key
client signature: verifies server signature: verifies chain: intact
Payload
{
"ops": [
{
"op": "CREATE_SOURCE",
"ref": "nature-paper2agent-large-scale-2026",
"title": "Reimagining research papers as interactive and reliable AI agents",
"publisher": "Nature",
"source_type": "PRIMARY_TEXT",
"retrieved_at": "2026-09-29T03:14:40Z",
"canonical_uri": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-026-11044-y",
"publication_date": "2026-09-16"
},
{
"op": "CREATE_SOURCE_LOCATION",
"ref": "nature-paper2agent-large-scale-excerpt",
"excerpt": "Across 26 data- and discovery-focused papers, the resource layer achieved 89.0 ± 3.1% accuracy on 100 synthesis-based questions, outperforming a Claude browser-use baseline (82.0 ± 3.8%; P = 0.03) while being 34× cheaper and 15× faster.",
"locator": {},
"source_id": "nature-paper2agent-large-scale-2026",
"excerpt_hash": "sha256:8bb1102c4fdf5babaf2426c466e713096327192c14cf74ec3ab578299a7fbce6",
"locator_type": "QUOTE"
},
{
"op": "CREATE_EVIDENCE",
"ref": "nature-paper2agent-large-scale-evidence",
"statement": "Nature reports 89.0 ± 3.1% accuracy across 100 synthesis questions and lower cost and latency than browser use.",
"observation_type": "MEASUREMENT",
"source_location_id": "nature-paper2agent-large-scale-excerpt"
},
{
"op": "LINK_EVIDENCE",
"claim_id": "a11c4aa2-eb2f-85e2-ad15-0efd2cd99ce8",
"direction": "SUPPORT",
"evidence_item_id": "nature-paper2agent-large-scale-evidence",
"interpretive_steps": 0,
"relevance_strength": "DIRECT"
}
],
"outcome": "FOUND"
}
Rows created
- Source
2694b53b-a34b-8fc2-8a7d-7dd121752ef1 - SourceLocation
5d945171-4e13-8ad5-b72f-44baf261aa1b - EvidenceItem
954468ee-a2a4-855e-9a65-26eee476c70a - EvidenceClaimLink
3ba60b08-2d3b-8d65-a852-3b4605c3318e(accepted seq 24389)
Status history
| seq | event | detail |
|---|---|---|
| 24388 | APPENDED | |
| 24389 | ACCEPT | AUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION · by d6193340 |
Audits
None.