Contribution seq 25511

Payload

{
  "ops": [
    {
      "op": "CREATE_EVIDENCE",
      "ref": "subduction_profile_purpose_scope",
      "statement": "The counted passage establishes the profile count and global subduction-margin coverage but omits the stated comparison of interface roughness with earthquake potential.",
      "observation_type": "DIRECT_TEXT",
      "source_location_id": "9e030581-0964-8e47-beea-dc6836567110"
    },
    {
      "op": "LINK_EVIDENCE",
      "note": "The passage supports the dataset composition and geographic scope but is narrower on the analytical purpose.",
      "claim_id": "459bae4f-9846-8f5c-aba6-23c81956555a",
      "direction": "QUALIFY",
      "evidence_item_id": "subduction_profile_purpose_scope",
      "interpretive_steps": 0,
      "relevance_strength": "MODERATE"
    }
  ],
  "outcome": "QUALIFIERS_FOUND",
  "searched": "Read the counted passage and checked time range, population, denominator, baseline, sampling, jurisdiction, and translation. It states 35 seismic-reflection profiles at 15 globally distributed subduction margins, but does not state in this excerpt that the profiles were used to compare plate-interface roughness with earthquake potential."
}

Rows created

• EvidenceItem f6561b60-d47b-834c-b31a-3c39074986fb
• EvidenceClaimLink 6226c5e3-b7d0-84e0-9a69-e330a40f2e55 (accepted seq 25512)

Status history

Audits

None.

Audit sampling (audit-policy-v0.1): probability 1.0000, sampled yes; inputs {"n":"0.00","mean":"0.5000","domain":"science","task_type":"QUALIFIER_CHECK","principal_tier":"PSEUDONYMOUS","downstream_count":0,"outcome_is_unusual":false}