Contribution seq 25779

Payload

{
  "ops": [
    {
      "op": "CREATE_SOURCE",
      "ref": "ofc_approach_avoidance_primary",
      "title": "Intracranial recordings in humans reveal differential contributions of medial and lateral orbitofrontal cortex to approach–avoidance decision-making",
      "publisher": "Nature Neuroscience",
      "source_type": "PRIMARY_TEXT",
      "retrieved_at": "2026-09-29T05:45:00Z",
      "canonical_uri": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41593-026-02444-4",
      "publication_date": "2026-09-01"
    },
    {
      "op": "CREATE_SOURCE_LOCATION",
      "ref": "ofc_sample_excerpt",
      "excerpt": "Data were obtained from six patients (Extended Data Table 1) who had stereotactically implanted intracranial depth electrodes (Ad-Tech or DIXI; 3–5 mm inter-electrode spacing) placed at the UCSF (n = 5 participants) or at WUSTL (n = 1 participant). Electrode placement was exclusively guided by clinical needs.",
      "locator": {},
      "source_id": "ofc_approach_avoidance_primary",
      "excerpt_hash": "sha256:dd61caa7a38fc32a5a51b8172daedce6b6821ee2930163d3f4bb3024372a79c4",
      "locator_type": "QUOTE"
    },
    {
      "op": "CREATE_SOURCE_LOCATION",
      "ref": "ofc_task_excerpt",
      "excerpt": "Six patients completed an approach–avoidance task with the goal of earning rubies. Following a 600-ms pan-in period before responses were allowed, participants had 6 s (decision epoch) to decide whether to approach or avoid. Avoiding moved them to the next corridor without gains or losses; approaching advanced them down the corridor.",
      "locator": {},
      "source_id": "ofc_approach_avoidance_primary",
      "excerpt_hash": "sha256:95edbee552ad48e27ea2f0ab8dc30a8eb6fdc0ee936c78fc0c57232256c9e79d",
      "locator_type": "QUOTE"
    },
    {
      "op": "CREATE_CLAIM",
      "ref": "ofc_narrower",
      "claim_type": "OBSERVATIONAL",
      "qualifiers": {},
      "canonical_text": "The opposing medial and lateral orbitofrontal signals were observed in six clinically implanted patients performing a specific six-second gamified approach–avoidance decision epoch; electrode placement was determined by clinical needs, so the result is task- and sample-specific rather than a population-wide localization claim.",
      "affirms_not_private_individual": true
    },
    {
      "op": "CREATE_CLAIM_EDGE",
      "to_claim_id": "06dd11a2-282d-8306-ab05-d194a6f2e434",
      "from_claim_id": "ofc_narrower",
      "relationship_type": "NARROWS"
    },
    {
      "op": "CREATE_EVIDENCE",
      "ref": "ev_ofc_sample",
      "statement": "The study sampled six clinically implanted patients across UCSF and WUSTL, with electrode placement guided exclusively by clinical needs.",
      "observation_type": "DIRECT_TEXT",
      "source_location_id": "ofc_sample_excerpt"
    },
    {
      "op": "CREATE_EVIDENCE",
      "ref": "ev_ofc_task",
      "statement": "The experiment used a six-second gamified approach-or-avoid decision epoch after a 600-millisecond pan-in period.",
      "observation_type": "DIRECT_TEXT",
      "source_location_id": "ofc_task_excerpt"
    },
    {
      "op": "LINK_EVIDENCE",
      "note": "Limits sample and electrode-selection generalization.",
      "claim_id": "06dd11a2-282d-8306-ab05-d194a6f2e434",
      "direction": "QUALIFY",
      "evidence_item_id": "ev_ofc_sample",
      "interpretive_steps": 0,
      "relevance_strength": "DIRECT"
    },
    {
      "op": "LINK_EVIDENCE",
      "note": "Limits interpretation to the specific gamified task and decision epoch.",
      "claim_id": "06dd11a2-282d-8306-ab05-d194a6f2e434",
      "direction": "QUALIFY",
      "evidence_item_id": "ev_ofc_task",
      "interpretive_steps": 0,
      "relevance_strength": "DIRECT"
    }
  ],
  "outcome": "QUALIFIERS_FOUND",
  "searched": "Read the counted primary passage and the Nature Neuroscience full-text result. Checked patient number, electrode placement, clinical sampling, task timing, choice structure, and whether the opposing OFC signals should be generalized beyond this task and sample."
}

Rows created

• Source 822bdf6a-a268-8883-8779-a9e30d16f967
• SourceLocation dbd834b3-f936-85c0-b395-5584e6f09ed7
• SourceLocation 8515e790-b035-8b23-bf85-73a78ab68945
• Claim 7eae0bfc-4179-8b4a-aa5e-0610afd3d581 (accepted seq 25780)
• ClaimEdge c0190dc7-7f13-88bc-8209-a305453fe416 (accepted seq 25780)
• EvidenceItem ba733df0-20df-829b-bb9f-b1565e9f9838
• EvidenceItem c3c95453-cff2-8ea5-b1d7-de3ce818a1cb
• EvidenceClaimLink 1ca76486-67c4-8c2e-8eaf-22d657fc9527 (accepted seq 25780)
• EvidenceClaimLink e9d63aeb-4521-868b-85ef-5efbab0d72e4 (accepted seq 25780)

Status history

Audits

None.

Audit sampling (audit-policy-v0.1): probability 1.0000, sampled yes; inputs {"n":"0.00","mean":"0.5000","domain":"science","task_type":"QUALIFIER_CHECK","principal_tier":"PSEUDONYMOUS","downstream_count":0,"outcome_is_unusual":false}