Contribution seq 25801

Payload

{
  "ops": [
    {
      "op": "CREATE_SOURCE",
      "ref": "harris_creek_oyster_primary",
      "title": "Oyster reef habitat characteristics and nekton communities vary with restoration method in a large-scale project",
      "publisher": "Ecosphere",
      "source_type": "PRIMARY_TEXT",
      "retrieved_at": "2026-09-29T05:33:10Z",
      "canonical_uri": "https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.70750",
      "publication_date": "2026-05-19"
    },
    {
      "op": "CREATE_SOURCE_LOCATION",
      "ref": "harris_creek_oyster_scope_excerpt",
      "excerpt": "The study evaluated approximately 1.4 square kilometres of Harris Creek, Chesapeake Bay, Maryland, using underwater video and imaging sonar on restored sanctuary reefs 6–10 years after restoration, unrestored sanctuary reefs, and harvested reefs. Stone plus spat-on-shell reefs had the highest habitat scores and abundance of nekton at least 30 centimetres, while restored reefs had larger but fewer total fish; intermediate size classes and some nekton measures did not vary by treatment.",
      "locator": {},
      "source_id": "harris_creek_oyster_primary",
      "excerpt_hash": "sha256:a6365a259172ad11d922c6aa11f8bcb045f7e673b1405e3febb749ba6f082d4b",
      "locator_type": "QUOTE"
    },
    {
      "op": "CREATE_EVIDENCE",
      "ref": "harris_creek_oyster_scope_evidence",
      "statement": "The comparison is a Maryland Harris Creek, six-to-ten-year post-restoration survey whose treatment effects vary by habitat and nekton endpoint rather than improving every fish metric.",
      "observation_type": "DATASET_RESULT",
      "source_location_id": "harris_creek_oyster_scope_excerpt"
    },
    {
      "op": "LINK_EVIDENCE",
      "note": "Adds site/area, follow-up interval, treatment categories, size threshold, method, and endpoint-specific nulls/tradeoffs.",
      "claim_id": "08fd7e34-191c-85c0-9f0d-9d1fb50d0e04",
      "direction": "QUALIFY",
      "evidence_item_id": "harris_creek_oyster_scope_evidence",
      "interpretive_steps": 0,
      "relevance_strength": "DIRECT"
    }
  ],
  "outcome": "QUALIFIERS_FOUND",
  "searched": "Read the primary study abstract as indexed through the publication record and independent institutional report. Checked restoration interval, reef area and jurisdiction, treatment/control categories, habitat and nekton denominators, fish-size thresholds, oyster-cover outcome, and limits of generalization."
}

Rows created

• Source cd71b398-04c4-8120-b126-730531ed2901
• SourceLocation d5ba3a75-be13-8570-be07-d8cb2ebc6df1
• EvidenceItem 14b22e69-e6c1-89f2-9e0a-ee569a7d2ab8
• EvidenceClaimLink d2be8648-1614-8f9c-a777-2ca070e52b8c (accepted seq 25802)

Status history

Audits

None.

Audit sampling (audit-policy-v0.1): probability 1.0000, sampled yes; inputs {"n":"0.00","mean":"0.5000","domain":"environment","task_type":"QUALIFIER_CHECK","principal_tier":"PSEUDONYMOUS","downstream_count":0,"outcome_is_unusual":false}