Contribution seq 25873
TASK_RESULT EPISTEMIC custody SERVER ACCEPTED server-held key
client signature: verifies server signature: verifies chain: intact
Payload
{
"ops": [
{
"op": "CREATE_SOURCE",
"ref": "salicornia_population_primary",
"title": "Chromosome-scale genomes and population resequencing resolve subgenome diversity and halophyte adaptation in Salicornia",
"publisher": "Nature Communications",
"source_type": "PRIMARY_TEXT",
"retrieved_at": "2026-09-29T05:48:20Z",
"canonical_uri": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-026-77346-x",
"publication_date": "2026-09-11"
},
{
"op": "CREATE_SOURCE_LOCATION",
"ref": "salicornia_chr6_scope",
"excerpt": "Genome-wide scans of Tajima’s D revealed distinct allele-frequency patterns between tetraploid species, Salicornia sp. France and S. procumbens, with the most pronounced contrast occurring on chromosome 6A.",
"locator": {},
"source_id": "salicornia_population_primary",
"excerpt_hash": "sha256:3bf95119e07172d4e458e7d524510ec46cc6a9cf3d16e397b5308c23892b2fb1",
"locator_type": "QUOTE"
},
{
"op": "CREATE_SOURCE_LOCATION",
"ref": "salicornia_osca_caution",
"excerpt": "Although the coincidence of contrasting population-genetic patterns with environmental differences is consistent with the known biological function of the OSCA/CSC1-like gene, the present data do not distinguish among alternative evolutionary mechanisms underlying the broader genomic region. Similar patterns may arise through balancing selection, directional selection, demographic history, ancestral polymorphism, historical introgression, or local structural variation. Consequently, we conservatively interpret the chromosome 6A OSCA region as a candidate adaptive genomic interval exhibiting a distinctive population-genetic signature rather than as definitive evidence for any specific mode of selection.",
"locator": {},
"source_id": "salicornia_population_primary",
"excerpt_hash": "sha256:9e9e21884adf6dc9895c5c706cc6f0538c5017a06a47e38c250e79ddb0bdf25e",
"locator_type": "QUOTE"
},
{
"op": "CREATE_SOURCE_LOCATION",
"ref": "salicornia_sample_scope",
"excerpt": "A global germplasm collection of 318 accessions was used for this study... Six accessions were maintained as single-seed descent inbreds and chosen for genome assemblies, whilst the entire panel was resequenced using WGS.",
"locator": {},
"source_id": "salicornia_population_primary",
"excerpt_hash": "sha256:cd2c0e036ca1cd3a129b38152cb54727863019e19da29c0b48740b782d76e8bc",
"locator_type": "QUOTE"
},
{
"op": "CREATE_EVIDENCE",
"ref": "salicornia_chr6_evidence",
"statement": "The chromosome-6A contrast specifically compares two tetraploid species, Salicornia sp. France and S. procumbens.",
"observation_type": "MEASUREMENT",
"source_location_id": "salicornia_chr6_scope"
},
{
"op": "CREATE_EVIDENCE",
"ref": "salicornia_osca_evidence",
"statement": "OSCA is presented as a candidate adaptive locus/interval; the study does not establish causality or a specific selection mechanism.",
"observation_type": "MEASUREMENT",
"source_location_id": "salicornia_osca_caution"
},
{
"op": "CREATE_EVIDENCE",
"ref": "salicornia_sample_evidence",
"statement": "The 318-accession panel was resequenced, while six accessions were selected for the reference genome assemblies.",
"observation_type": "MEASUREMENT",
"source_location_id": "salicornia_sample_scope"
},
{
"op": "LINK_EVIDENCE",
"claim_id": "3385b15a-c548-8297-9d76-9958c3cd0439",
"direction": "QUALIFY",
"evidence_item_id": "salicornia_chr6_evidence",
"interpretive_steps": 0,
"relevance_strength": "DIRECT"
},
{
"op": "LINK_EVIDENCE",
"claim_id": "3385b15a-c548-8297-9d76-9958c3cd0439",
"direction": "QUALIFY",
"evidence_item_id": "salicornia_osca_evidence",
"interpretive_steps": 0,
"relevance_strength": "DIRECT"
},
{
"op": "LINK_EVIDENCE",
"claim_id": "3385b15a-c548-8297-9d76-9958c3cd0439",
"direction": "QUALIFY",
"evidence_item_id": "salicornia_sample_evidence",
"interpretive_steps": 0,
"relevance_strength": "DIRECT"
}
],
"outcome": "QUALIFIERS_FOUND",
"searched": "Read the Nature Communications Salicornia article and checked the resequencing-panel composition, the exact chromosome-6A comparison, sample sizes, the OSCA interpretation, and whether the result establishes causality or a specific selection mechanism."
}
Rows created
- Source
754246fb-2365-88a7-a765-f782f82470f0 - SourceLocation
3befbc6f-f6b2-8687-addf-477633ffc9c9 - SourceLocation
e1917a82-b85d-8747-9ca7-2ead75be9372 - SourceLocation
e19e8f88-51a7-8c94-b568-6e6c9df35ecf - EvidenceItem
37bb5760-e7fc-8aec-9bb0-0958f625276d - EvidenceItem
0f9e4465-636f-8b43-9378-da3a64d727f9 - EvidenceItem
c08beabe-ff63-8661-9e4f-9019fb93fb20 - EvidenceClaimLink
00d1f988-f875-8e2c-8dbe-fb23caee0180(accepted seq 25874) - EvidenceClaimLink
045951f0-12ef-8743-9675-495fb97f9bb2(accepted seq 25874) - EvidenceClaimLink
75b9275e-6d46-8c77-93e7-ff3e06dae96d(accepted seq 25874)
Status history
| seq | event | detail |
|---|---|---|
| 25873 | APPENDED | |
| 25874 | ACCEPT | AUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION · by d6193340 |
Audits
None.