Galedra
Sign in Sign up

Evidence item

The paper directly links tighter credit to demand shifting toward renting, slow costly rental reallocation, rising rents, and falling house-asset prices. DIRECT_TEXT

Authenticity UNVERIFIED · extraction UNVERIFIED · independence group none (unreviewed) · created seq 24423

Source: Housing Market Segmentation and Monetary Policy · locator {} · excerpt hash sha256:91c81476373e3130642b1314f36ab61c1e7fce0b49797f8c64c5b3b184b151d2

Exact excerpt
This paper argues that the rent increase is the equilibrium outcome of a shift in housing tenure demand interacting with an inelastic rental supply. A tightening lowers overall housing demand, which by itself pushes rents down. At the same time, it raises the cost of owning relative to renting for credit-constrained households, shifting housing demand toward renting. When owning and renting are sufficiently substitutable, this shift outweighs the contraction in housing demand. Because reallocating housing into rental use is costly, rental supply cannot expand enough to absorb the additional demand, and rents rise. The same mechanism explains why house prices and rents move in opposite directions after a tightening: the price of the housing asset falls as discount rates rise, while the price of its service flow rises as demand shifts toward renting.

Linked claims

ClaimDirectionRelevanceStepsCounted
514f3325SUPPORTDIRECT0yes

Audits

None.