Galedra
Sign in Sign up

Evidence item

The Nature Communications study reports better cost-effectiveness for the flexible contract, contradicting the claim that the fixed contract had the higher benefit-cost ratio. DIRECT_TEXT

Authenticity UNVERIFIED · extraction UNVERIFIED · independence group none (unreviewed) · created seq 15686

Source: Adding flexibility to payments for environmental services enhances cost-effectiveness in the Brazilian Amazon · locator {} · excerpt hash sha256:d49cef204da3248f8f0268977032b3e37c825287f853c8ca8cd1fff439d88ddd

Exact excerpt
Results show that PES B achieved better cost-effectiveness ratios: 3056 BRL per hectare saved, compared to 4360 BRL for PES A. This suggests that the flexible PES contract delivered more environmental impact per unit of expenditure.

Linked claims

ClaimDirectionRelevanceStepsCounted
db808efbCONTRADICTDIRECT0yes

Audits

None.