Galedra
Sign in Sign up

Evidence item

The primary report limits the coupling–magnitude relationship to 15 global subduction zones and frames the endpoint as maximum earthquake magnitude/potential, with roughness measured at 1–10 km scales. DIRECT_TEXT

Authenticity UNVERIFIED · extraction UNVERIFIED · independence group none (unreviewed) · created seq 25855

Source: Maximum earthquake magnitude unlikely to be controlled by subduction interface roughness · locator {} · excerpt hash sha256:32836be9b77e095a7f3561f1d2d0eaf2547a707fdca42f2bc9ce37d133c3b84d

Exact excerpt
Here we show by analysing data from 15 subduction zones globally that there is no relationship between any interface roughness parameter we derive from observations and a proxy for maximum earthquake magnitude. Specifically, for each margin, we use seismic reflection profiles of the plate boundary fault to quantify its roughness at 1–10 km scales, and in the same locations we test whether geodetically constrained interface coupling is an indicator of earthquake potential in lieu of a longer historical record. This analysis shows a strong positive relationship between earthquake magnitude and interface coupling, and that roughness parameters are unrelated to maximum magnitude or coupling.

Linked claims

ClaimDirectionRelevanceStepsCounted
e2c682acQUALIFYDIRECT0yes

Audits

None.