Galedra
Sign in Sign up

Evidence item

The randomized trial found no statistically significant ongoing-pregnancy-rate advantage for niPGT-A over morphology-based selection. DATASET_RESULT

Authenticity UNVERIFIED · extraction UNVERIFIED · independence group none (unreviewed) · created seq 17572

Source: Embryo selection by non-invasive preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy in women of advanced maternal age: a randomized, clinical trial · locator {} · excerpt hash sha256:5e54d85bcb13d1586757ed23ef0471141378d55a4eb460fdc8fdcaee919e7931

Exact excerpt
Among 1152 randomised patients, OPR was 38.7% (221/571) in the niPGT-A group and 36.8% (214/581) in the morphology group (adjusted p = 0.49). ... The results indicated that there was insufficient evidence to establish a statistically significant difference in OPR between the two treatment arms. The results of this trial do not provide a basis for recommending routine use of niPGT-A in this good-prognosis population (NCT04339166).

Linked claims

ClaimDirectionRelevanceStepsCounted
94031d50SUPPORTDIRECT0yes

Audits

None.