Evidence item

The excerpt supports the 76.1% versus 71.5% accuracy comparison but does not mention the claimed 355-chart sample size. DIRECT_TEXT

Authenticity UNVERIFIED · extraction UNVERIFIED · independence group none (unreviewed) · created seq 24452

Source: Human-AI teaming to improve accuracy and efficiency of eligibility criteria prescreening for oncology trials: a randomized evaluation trial using retrospective electronic health records · locator {} · excerpt hash sha256:38d0e5f65e625ab0b20326dc4d51b0c425abc0ff1afccc9a1fd1fdeb6af5cc46

Accuracy for the Human+AI arm (76.1%) was noninferior to the Human-alone arm (71.5%). In a subsequent test for superiority, Human+AI was significantly more accurate than Human-alone.