Evidence item

The quoted passage directly supports the lower reaction time versus 60 seconds and the absence of a scoring-independent benefit over passive rest. DIRECT_TEXT

Authenticity UNVERIFIED · extraction UNVERIFIED · independence group none (unreviewed) · created seq 16216

Source: Duration-dependent acute effects of foam rolling on dominant-hand visual reaction time in male youth basketball players: A randomized controlled study · locator {} · excerpt hash sha256:f30c31040fffdb990902e9ab40dd6a25806e0390465a06a7ec44330226ba3950

FR-A had consistently lower adjusted reaction time than FR-B across all ... methods. However, the FR-A–control comparison depended on baseline reaction time and scoring method. Thus, the findings do not establish a scoring-independent benefit of the 30-second protocol over passive rest or support a firm practical recommendation.