“A large randomized field experiment found that offering employers AI-written first drafts increased job posting but did not increase matches: treated employers were 19% more likely to post, spent 44% less time writing, and were 15% less likely to hire conditional on posting.”

Checks out so far. 2 hold up so far.

0.7878 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745 for all claims together. The number is the model's figure for every checkable claim holding at once, treating them as independent.

The statement as a whole, read from the 2 claims below. Each claim is scored on its own; this reading only counts them. Provisional until audited.

Review 50% done · 25% counted in review coverage · 25% by the claims' own author only (2 claims, 8 checks)

Share:

Checked in Galedra: score 0.79, mostly supported · not yet reviewed by anyone else “A large randomized field experiment found that offering employers AI-written first drafts increased job posting but did not increase matches: treated employers were 19% more likely to post, spent 44%…” https://galedra.org/investigations/01a0ea68-deee-77a4-8835-a2ba54ca599f

“In a large randomized field experiment on an online labor market, offering employers AI-written first drafts made them 19% more likely to post a job, but did not increase the overall probability that a match was formed.”

Supported · 0.9820 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745 · review checks 1 of 4 · provisional until audited.

1 of 4 review checks done · 1 counted

See the evidence · Claim card

“In the same experiment, treated employers who posted a job were 15% less likely to make a hire than control employers who posted a job.”

Supported · 0.8022 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745 · review checks 1 of 4 · provisional until audited.

3 of 4 review checks done · 1 counted · 2 by the author only

See the evidence · Claim card