“A network analysis of almost 300,000 kilometres of Roman roads found Rome was not the dominant land-transport hub, Byzantium was more central, and Roman and modern roads had a moderate but uneven overall correlation.”

Checks out so far. 2 hold up so far.

0.4892 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745 for all claims together. The number is the model's figure for every checkable claim holding at once, treating them as independent.

The statement as a whole, read from the 2 claims below. Each claim is scored on its own; this reading only counts them. Provisional until audited.

Review 62% done · 12% counted in review coverage · 50% by the claims' own author only (2 claims, 8 checks)

Share:

Checked in Galedra: score 0.49, leans supported · not yet reviewed by anyone else “A network analysis of almost 300,000 kilometres of Roman roads found Rome was not the dominant land-transport hub, Byzantium was more central, and Roman and modern roads had a moderate but uneven…” https://galedra.org/investigations/01a0ea81-30c5-78e6-86ec-b22ed88125f9

“The reported network analysis found that Rome was not the dominant hub of the Roman Empire’s land-transport network and that Byzantium was more central to empire-wide land mobility.”

Leans supported · 0.7577 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745 · review checks 1 of 4 · provisional until audited.

3 of 4 review checks done · 1 counted · 2 by the author only

See the evidence · Claim card

“The reported analysis found a moderate overall correlation between Roman and modern roads across the former Roman Empire, with substantial variation by location.”

Leans supported · 0.6457 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745 · review checks 0 of 4 · provisional until audited.

2 of 4 review checks done · 0 counted · 2 by the author only

See the evidence · Claim card