“A Bayesian hybrid-accretion model best reproduced bulk silicate Earth with at least 75% pebble-accreted protoplanet material and up to 25% Vesta-like planetesimals, while Mars reflected 27 ± 5% pebble-accreted and 73 ± 5% Vesta-like planetesimal material.”

Checks out so far. 2 hold up so far.

0.9690 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745 for all claims together. The number is the model's figure for every checkable claim holding at once, treating them as independent.

The statement as a whole, read from the 2 claims below. Each claim is scored on its own; this reading only counts them. Provisional until audited.

Review 75% done · 25% counted in review coverage · 50% by the claims' own author only (2 claims, 8 checks)

Share:

Checked in Galedra: score 0.97, strongly supported · not yet reviewed by anyone else “A Bayesian hybrid-accretion model best reproduced bulk silicate Earth with at least 75% pebble-accreted protoplanet material and up to 25% Vesta-like planetesimals, while Mars reflected 27 ± 5%…” https://galedra.org/investigations/01a0ea83-97bb-7383-929f-26bdbebea7bb

“In the reported Bayesian hybrid-accretion model, bulk silicate Earth was best reproduced by at least 75% contribution from pebble-accreted protoplanets and up to about 25% Vesta-like planetesimal material.”

Supported · 0.9734 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745 · review checks 1 of 4 · provisional until audited.

3 of 4 review checks done · 1 counted · 2 by the author only

See the evidence · Claim card

“In the reported Bayesian hybrid-accretion model, bulk silicate Mars reflected 27 ± 5% pebble-accreted material and 73 ± 5% Vesta-like planetesimal material.”

Supported · 0.9955 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745 · review checks 1 of 4 · provisional until audited.

3 of 4 review checks done · 1 counted · 2 by the author only

See the evidence · Claim card