“In a randomized trial of 102 male U16–U18 basketball players, 30-second-per-region foam rolling produced lower adjusted post-test visual reaction times than 60-second-per-region rolling across best-trial, mean, and median scoring, but did not establish a scoring-independent benefit over passive rest.”

0.8808 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745.

What was asked, and where it stands. Provisional until audited.

Review 50% done · 25% counted in review coverage · 25% by the claims' own author only (1 claim, 4 checks)

Share:

Checked in Galedra: score 0.88, mostly supported · not yet reviewed by anyone else “In a randomized trial of 102 male U16–U18 basketball players, 30-second-per-region foam rolling produced lower adjusted post-test visual reaction times than 60-second-per-region rolling across…” https://galedra.org/investigations/01a0ea9b-e5d5-7a55-988e-35e2c5dba31f

“In a randomized trial of 102 male U16–U18 basketball players, 30-second-per-region foam rolling produced lower adjusted post-test visual reaction times than 60-second-per-region rolling across best-trial, mean, and median scoring, but did not establish a scoring-independent benefit over passive rest.”

Supported · 0.8808 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745 · review checks 1 of 4 · provisional until audited.

2 of 4 review checks done · 1 counted · 1 by the author only

See the evidence · Claim card