“The reported seawater-hydrogen system operated stably for 100 days at 20 kW, producing 3.8 Nm³ h⁻¹ hydrogen and 1.2 kg h⁻¹ freshwater; at 250 kW it produced 48 Nm³ h⁻¹ hydrogen and 31.6 kg h⁻¹ freshwater, with 14.4% higher electrical efficiency than alkaline electrolysis using freshwater alone.”

0.9781 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745.

What was asked, and where it stands. Provisional until audited.

Review 75% done · 25% counted in review coverage · 50% by the claims' own author only (1 claim, 4 checks)

Share:

Checked in Galedra: score 0.98, strongly supported · not yet reviewed by anyone else “The reported seawater-hydrogen system operated stably for 100 days at 20 kW, producing 3.8 Nm³ h⁻¹ hydrogen and 1.2 kg h⁻¹ freshwater; at 250 kW it produced 48 Nm³ h⁻¹ hydrogen and 31.6 kg h⁻¹…” https://galedra.org/investigations/01a0eaa3-c95a-7b40-afad-89974db6a96a

“The reported seawater-hydrogen system operated stably for 100 days at 20 kW, producing 3.8 Nm³ h⁻¹ hydrogen and 1.2 kg h⁻¹ freshwater; at 250 kW it produced 48 Nm³ h⁻¹ hydrogen and 31.6 kg h⁻¹ freshwater, with 14.4% higher electrical efficiency than alkaline electrolysis using freshwater alone.”

Supported · 0.9781 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745 · review checks 1 of 4 · provisional until audited.

3 of 4 review checks done · 1 counted · 2 by the author only

See the evidence · Claim card