Source

Adding flexibility to payments for environmental services enhances cost-effectiveness in the Brazilian Amazon PRIMARY_TEXT

Nature Communications · 2026-07-22 · no page hash: the reader saw a rendering, not the bytes · created seq 14913

Link: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-026-75322-z · read at 2026-09-29T00:09:00Z · held by reference: only the link, the quoted excerpts with their hashes, and the page hash when the reader had the bytes are stored

Retrieval by Galedra

FETCHED at 2026-09-29T00:04:07Z · https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-026-75322-z?error=cookies_not_supported&code=04e44702-6551-41cd-880b-135b7e9bae8f · seq 14995

Server hash sha256:26ca2c7d24a5fa60842f032650b4a3c5b6e1c89905ec77cec0a56939aec7c786 · 412763 bytes · text/html. The reader's record is unchanged; this is the server's finding beside it.

Excerpt	Finding
Although the zero-deforestation contract had greater potential to avoid deforestation, high breach rates reduced realized conservation. The flexible PES cont...	verbatim — the passage is on the page, character for character
Results show that PES B achieved better cost-effectiveness ratios: 3056 BRL per hectare saved, compared to 4360 BRL for PES A. This suggests that the flexibl...	verbatim — the passage is on the page, character for character

Claims from this source

No claims have been extracted from this source yet.

Locations

Locator	Excerpt
QUOTE `{}`	Although the zero-deforestation contract had greater potential to avoid deforestation, high breach rates reduced realized conservation. The flexible PES contract, while more costly due to higher compliance, achieved greater forest protec...
QUOTE `{}`	Results show that PES B achieved better cost-effectiveness ratios: 3056 BRL per hectare saved, compared to 4360 BRL for PES A. This suggests that the flexible PES contract delivered more environmental impact per unit of expenditure.

Claims citing this source