Claim

In the study, a neural classifier distinguished biological from linear virtual-conspecific motion with 72.6% classification accuracy during stimulus presentation and before the action.

Type QUANTITATIVE · truth-evaluable: yes · status at snapshot: ACTIVE · created seq 21049

a conjunction joins clauses that may be separately evaluable

Referenced 98 times: checked 2, looked up by assistants 0, viewed 62, shared 34. A count of attention, not evidence.

Topics

Neuroscience · 1efd24fe Statistics · 1efd24fe

Assessment

Supported

Score: 0.9781 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745

1 of 4 review checks done · 1 counted

2 independent evidence lineages · review checks 1 of 4 · stability HIGH

Main unresolved issue: 3 counted evidence items have no independence review; repeats of one origin may be counted as several coverage:031eaa86-425b-8f98-9582-90b255515898

Not yet independently audited.Evidence reviewed so far supports this claim, but only 1 of 4 review checks has been done.A quoted passage from nature.com was not found on the page when Galedra fetched it.

Why?

Strongest counted support: The primary study reports classifier performance for biological versus linear motion. weight 2.000000 evidence

Suppressed as dependent: The excerpt directly reports biological-versus-linear motion classification at 72.6% accuracy during stimulus presentation and before action.

Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Supported to Supported.

Hide calculation

0.9781 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745 · state Supported · Review checks: 1 of 4 · stability HIGH · 3 sources, 2 independent lineages

Model ledger-default@0.3.0 (the default model, not the answer) · snapshot 27745 · trace sha256:13fa18b02147228035ab324920a7e4a4e48bda6fd04225e57e821d42f47b55a9

Last changed at entry seq 24841; nothing logged since has borne on this claim.

How the number was reached

Each counted link is weighed by multiplying the factors the model declares; a factor it does not declare is not shown. Every factor name below links to what that number means.

Link	Working	Weight	Counted as
fe8a5860 support	relevance DIRECT 2.0 × observation DIRECT_TEXT 0.9 × interpretation 0 steps, 1 − 0.15 × 0 1.000000 × authenticity UNVERIFIED 1.0 × extraction UNVERIFIED 1.0 × provenance INDEPENDENT 1.0 × edition NAMED_OR_UNRELATED 1	1.800000	1.800000
779882da support	relevance DIRECT 2.0 × observation DIRECT_TEXT 0.9 × interpretation 0 steps, 1 − 0.15 × 0 1.000000 × authenticity UNVERIFIED 1.0 × extraction UNVERIFIED 1.0 × provenance INDEPENDENT 1.0 × edition NAMED_OR_UNRELATED 1	1.800000	0.000000 (dependent strongest only, kept 0b827637)
0b827637 support	relevance DIRECT 2.0 × observation MEASUREMENT 1.0 × interpretation 0 steps, 1 − 0.15 × 0 1.000000 × authenticity UNVERIFIED 1.0 × extraction UNVERIFIED 1.0 × provenance INDEPENDENT 1.0 × edition NAMED_OR_UNRELATED 1	2.000000	2.000000

prior 0.50 → log-odds 0.000000 + 3.800000 (the counted weights) = 3.800000 → probability 0.9781

Under neighbouring settings of the same model: 0.9346 to 0.9929, a spread of 0.0583.

Half-even rounding, six places for weights and four for the probability. The same inputs under the same model reproduce this exactly; that is what the trace hash above is for. How a score is worked out explains every factor, why it is there, and what the model sets it to.

Your view

Registered views

Nobody has registered a view yet.

Registered views are personal belief, not evidence: they never change Galedra's assessment. Affiliations are self-declared and shown only for groups of 5 or more.

Checked as part of

Statements this claim was broken out of. The claim is scored on its own; a statement's reading only counts its claims.

“In the study, a neural classifier distinguished biological from linear virtual-conspecific motion with 72.6% classification accuracy during stimulus...” · 1 claim · 29 September 2026
“A primary Nature study investigated how glassfish neural activity detects social escape actions and supports collective avoidance.” · 3 claims · 29 September 2026

Evidence for

The primary study reports classifier performance for biological versus linear motion.

From Neuronal detection of social actions directs collective escape behaviour Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

Primary decoding result.
The primary study reports 72.6% classifier accuracy for biological versus linear virtual-conspecific motion.

From Neuronal detection of social actions directs collective escape behaviour Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

Quoted quantitative result from the primary study.
The excerpt directly reports biological-versus-linear motion classification at 72.6% accuracy during stimulus presentation and before action.

From Neuronal detection of social actions directs collective escape behaviour Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

None.

Suppressed as dependent

Evidence	Group	Kept instead
254d93c7		0b827637

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

None. Edges are stored and displayed; v0.1 does not propagate probability across them.

Review checklist

Review checks: 1 of 4

1 check by this claim's own author, alongside the independent review above. 1 EVIDENCE VERIFICATION. A check by the person who recorded a claim does not raise its review coverage.

Check	Done	By
qualifiers reviewed	no
opposing search done	no
independence reviewed	no
primary source reviewed	yes	fe8a5860, 779882da, 0b827637

Summary

Supported. The main support is: The primary study reports 72.6% classifier accuracy for biological versus linear virtual-conspecific motion. e6e15740

1 further item repeats the same origin and is not independent evidence. 254d93c7

Review checks: 1 of 4. coverage:031eaa86-425b-8f98-9582-90b255515898

Generated by stub-v0.1; every sentence cites graph ids.

Contribution history

seq	event	detail
21049	APPENDED
21050	ACCEPT	AUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
21063	LINK_EVIDENCE	by 1efd24fe (accepted)
21126	LINK_EVIDENCE	by 1efd24fe (accepted)
24840	TASK_RESULT	by 1efd24fe (accepted)

Score trace

{
  "claim": "031eaa86-425b-8f98-9582-90b255515898",
  "links": [
    {
      "link": "494daea5-8c7b-8b49-aeb5-6ddefe8a5860",
      "group": null,
      "edition": "NAMED_OR_UNRELATED",
      "evidence": "77a4a252-67e4-8e7c-8b40-4bd4e6e15740",
      "direction": "SUPPORT",
      "magnitude": "1.800000",
      "relevance": "DIRECT",
      "extraction": "UNVERIFIED",
      "provenance": "INDEPENDENT",
      "observation": "DIRECT_TEXT",
      "source_type": "PRIMARY_TEXT",
      "authenticity": "UNVERIFIED",
      "audit_confirmed": false,
      "effective_weight": "1.800000",
      "interpretive_steps": 0
    },
    {
      "kept": "fa2b96f4-1172-8242-aca7-56f00b827637",
      "link": "de021c3a-2dfc-8b01-9d71-ac10779882da",
      "group": null,
      "reason": "dependent_strongest_only",
      "edition": "NAMED_OR_UNRELATED",
      "evidence": "bd946f81-439d-8824-a732-29cd254d93c7",
      "direction": "SUPPORT",
      "magnitude": "1.800000",
      "relevance": "DIRECT",
      "extraction": "UNVERIFIED",
      "provenance": "INDEPENDENT",
      "observation": "DIRECT_TEXT",
      "source_type": "PRIMARY_TEXT",
      "authenticity": "UNVERIFIED",
      "audit_confirmed": false,
      "effective_weight": "0.000000",
      "interpretive_steps": 0
    },
    {
      "link": "fa2b96f4-1172-8242-aca7-56f00b827637",
      "group": null,
      "edition": "NAMED_OR_UNRELATED",
      "evidence": "abbecca7-5eae-8630-82bb-8bc8ed578566",
      "direction": "SUPPORT",
      "magnitude": "2.000000",
      "relevance": "DIRECT",
      "extraction": "UNVERIFIED",
      "provenance": "INDEPENDENT",
      "observation": "MEASUREMENT",
      "source_type": "PRIMARY_TEXT",
      "authenticity": "UNVERIFIED",
      "audit_confirmed": false,
      "effective_weight": "2.000000",
      "interpretive_steps": 0
    }
  ],
  "model": "ledger-default@0.3.0",
  "prior": "0.50",
  "variants": {
    "spread": "0.0583",
    "permissive": "0.9929",
    "conservative": "0.9346"
  },
  "code_hash": "sha256:c61a6fdf35a754a0d7e958df149036a083c0eaeb7d2d2e52704ec32b0c36def7",
  "contested": false,
  "stability": "HIGH",
  "claim_type": "QUANTITATIVE",
  "config_hash": "sha256:86768038080b8ab5233f1e4b7aba10af05b5bb44caa432095150b90e81209809",
  "probability": "0.9781",
  "provisional": true,
  "evidence_sum": "3.800000",
  "snapshot_seq": 24841,
  "prior_log_odds": "0.000000",
  "support_groups": 2,
  "model_dependent": false,
  "review_coverage": "0.25",
  "truth_evaluable": true,
  "assessment_state": "SUPPORTED",
  "review_checklist": {
    "qualifiers_reviewed": {
      "by": [],
      "ok": false
    },
    "opposing_search_done": {
      "by": [],
      "ok": false
    },
    "independence_reviewed": {
      "by": [],
      "ok": false
    },
    "primary_source_reviewed": {
      "by": [
        "494daea5-8c7b-8b49-aeb5-6ddefe8a5860",
        "de021c3a-2dfc-8b01-9d71-ac10779882da",
        "fa2b96f4-1172-8242-aca7-56f00b827637"
      ],
      "ok": true
    }
  },
  "contradict_groups": 0,
  "rounding_boundary": false,
  "posterior_log_odds": "3.800000",
  "not_applicable_reason": null,
  "independence_unreviewed": 3
}