Claim

Model ledger-default@0.1.0 ledger-strict@0.1.0 ledger-default@0.2.0 ledger-strict@0.2.0 ledger-default@0.3.0 (default) ledger-strict@0.3.0 Snapshot seq

Topics

Neuroscience · 1efd24fe Statistics · 1efd24fe

Assessment

Why?

Strongest counted support: The primary study reports classifier performance for biological versus linear motion. weight 2.000000 evidence

Suppressed as dependent: The excerpt directly reports biological-versus-linear motion classification at 72.6% accuracy during stimulus presentation and before action.

Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Supported to Supported.

Show calculation

Your view

Registered views

Checked as part of

Statements this claim was broken out of. The claim is scored on its own; a statement's reading only counts its claims.

• “In the study, a neural classifier distinguished biological from linear virtual-conspecific motion with 72.6% classification accuracy during stimulus...” · 1 claim · 29 September 2026
• “A primary Nature study investigated how glassfish neural activity detects social escape actions and supports collective avoidance.” · 3 claims · 29 September 2026

Evidence for

• The primary study reports classifier performance for biological versus linear motion.

  From Neuronal detection of social actions directs collective escape behaviour Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

  Primary decoding result.

• The primary study reports 72.6% classifier accuracy for biological versus linear virtual-conspecific motion.

  From Neuronal detection of social actions directs collective escape behaviour Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

  Quoted quantitative result from the primary study.

• The excerpt directly reports biological-versus-linear motion classification at 72.6% accuracy during stimulus presentation and before action.

  From Neuronal detection of social actions directs collective escape behaviour Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

None.

Suppressed as dependent

Evidence	Group	Kept instead
254d93c7		0b827637

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

None. Edges are stored and displayed; v0.1 does not propagate probability across them.

Review checklist

Review checks: 1 of 4

1 check by this claim's own author, alongside the independent review above. 1 EVIDENCE VERIFICATION. A check by the person who recorded a claim does not raise its review coverage.

Check	Done	By
qualifiers reviewed	no
opposing search done	no
independence reviewed	no
primary source reviewed	yes	fe8a5860, 779882da, 0b827637

Summary

Contribution history

seq	event	detail
21049	APPENDED
21050	ACCEPT	AUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
21063	LINK_EVIDENCE	by 1efd24fe (accepted)
21126	LINK_EVIDENCE	by 1efd24fe (accepted)
24840	TASK_RESULT	by 1efd24fe (accepted)