Claim

Model ledger-default@0.1.0 ledger-strict@0.1.0 ledger-default@0.2.0 ledger-strict@0.2.0 ledger-default@0.3.0 (default) ledger-strict@0.3.0 Snapshot seq

Topics

Public health · 1efd24fe Society · 1efd24fe

Assessment

Why?

Strongest counted support: The intervention lacked a significant 90-day sustained adoption effect but increased one-day smoke-free-home adoption and seven-day abstinence. weight 1.800000 evidence

Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Supported to Unresolved.

Show calculation

Your view

Registered views

Checked as part of

Statements this claim was broken out of. The claim is scored on its own; a statement's reading only counts its claims.

• “In a cluster-randomized trial of 400 permanent-supportive-housing residents, a brief smoke-free-home intervention did not significantly increase adoption...” · 1 claim · 29 September 2026

Evidence for

• The intervention lacked a significant 90-day sustained adoption effect but increased one-day smoke-free-home adoption and seven-day abstinence.

  From Smoke-Free Home Intervention in Permanent Supportive Housing: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

• The packet supports the 400-resident sample, null 90-day adoption result, and increased one-day adoption, but omits the seven-day abstinence result.

  From Smoke-Free Home Intervention in Permanent Supportive Housing: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

  The packet does not establish every clause in the claim.

• The counted passage reports 400 residents, six-month sustained adoption, and one-day adoption, but omits cluster randomization and the seven-day abstinence outcome.

  From Smoke-Free Home Intervention in Permanent Supportive Housing: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial Read 2026-09-29 Relevance MODERATE Steps 0 Counted

  Limits what this passage establishes about design and secondary outcome measures.

Suppressed as dependent

None.

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

None. Edges are stored and displayed; v0.1 does not propagate probability across them.

Review checklist

Review checks: 1 of 4

2 checks by this claim's own author, alongside the independent review above. 1 QUALIFIER CHECK · 1 EVIDENCE VERIFICATION. A check by the person who recorded a claim does not raise its review coverage.

Check	Done	By
qualifiers reviewed	no
opposing search done	no
independence reviewed	no
primary source reviewed	yes	d7166945, 4f7e6b40, c62613b1

Summary

Contribution history

seq	event	detail
17851	APPENDED
17852	ACCEPT	AUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
17857	LINK_EVIDENCE	by 1efd24fe (accepted)
17860	TASK_RESULT	by 1efd24fe (accepted)
25371	TASK_RESULT	by 1efd24fe (accepted)