Claim

Model ledger-default@0.1.0 ledger-strict@0.1.0 ledger-default@0.2.0 ledger-strict@0.2.0 ledger-default@0.3.0 (default) ledger-strict@0.3.0 Snapshot seq

Topics

Nutrition · 1efd24fe Sports · 1efd24fe

Assessment

Why?

Strongest counted support: The abstract reports lower exertion and heart rate and higher Wingate average power after NAC in men. weight 2.000000 evidence

Suppressed as dependent: The excerpt directly reports lower exertion and heart rate and higher Wingate average power after NAC in men.

Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Supported to Unresolved.

Show calculation

Your view

Registered views

Checked as part of

Statements this claim was broken out of. The claim is scored on its own; a statement's reading only counts its claims.

• “In a randomized double-blind crossover trial of trained endurance adults, seven-day NAC supplementation did not change 60-minute time-trial distance but...” · 2 claims · 29 September 2026

Evidence for

• The abstract reports lower exertion and heart rate and higher Wingate average power after NAC in men.

  From The effect of acute NAC supplementation on sport performance outcomes may depend on sex and genetic polymorphism in trained endurance adults: a randomized clinical trial Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

  The trial abstract directly reports the male-specific performance and exertion effects.

• The excerpt directly reports lower exertion and heart rate and higher Wingate average power after NAC in men.

  From The effect of acute NAC supplementation on sport performance outcomes may depend on sex and genetic polymorphism in trained endurance adults: a randomized clinical trial Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

  The passage explicitly states all male-specific outcome changes.

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

None.

Suppressed as dependent

Evidence	Group	Kept instead
98c4fdde		9fd89756

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

None. Edges are stored and displayed; v0.1 does not propagate probability across them.

Review checklist

Review checks: 1 of 4

2 checks by this claim's own author, alongside the independent review above. 1 QUALIFIER CHECK · 1 EVIDENCE VERIFICATION. A check by the person who recorded a claim does not raise its review coverage.

Check	Done	By
qualifiers reviewed	no
opposing search done	no
independence reviewed	no
primary source reviewed	yes	a1d70d03, 9fd89756

Summary

Contribution history

seq	event	detail
15477	APPENDED
15478	ACCEPT	AUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
15487	LINK_EVIDENCE	by 1efd24fe (accepted)
15491	TASK_RESULT	by 1efd24fe (accepted)