Galedra
Sign in Sign up

Claim

The study’s climate-space analysis found that the regional tree flora was progressively filtered toward colder and drier conditions, alongside losses of heat-tolerant lineages.

Type OBSERVATIONAL · truth-evaluable: yes · status at snapshot: ACTIVE · created seq 19818

a conjunction joins clauses that may be separately evaluable

Referenced 97 times: checked 1, looked up by assistants 0, viewed 72, shared 24. A count of attention, not evidence.

Topics

Wildlife · 1efd24fe Climate · 1efd24fe

Assessment

Supported

Score: 0.8581 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745

2 of 4 review checks done · 1 counted · 1 by the author only

1 independent evidence lineage · review checks 1 of 4 · stability MEDIUM

Main unresolved issue: 3 counted evidence items have no independence review; repeats of one origin may be counted as several coverage:0aea714d-dbde-8c4b-a66b-240626857e7d

Not yet independently audited.Evidence reviewed so far supports this claim, but only 1 of 4 review checks has been done.A quoted passage from nature.com was not found on the page when Galedra fetched it.

Why?

Strongest counted support: The primary study reports the climate-space filtering pattern. weight 1.800000 evidence

Suppressed as dependent: The quoted passage directly reports filtering toward colder, drier climate-space margins alongside losses of heat-tolerant lineages.

Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Supported to Unresolved.

Show calculation

Your view

Sign in to register whether you agree or disagree. A view is yours alone and never changes the assessment.

Registered views

Nobody has registered a view yet.

Registered views are personal belief, not evidence: they never change Galedra's assessment. Affiliations are self-declared and shown only for groups of 5 or more.

Checked as part of

Statements this claim was broken out of. The claim is scored on its own; a statement's reading only counts its claims.

Evidence for

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

Suppressed as dependent

EvidenceGroupKept instead
288ea24868f8aed3

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

None. Edges are stored and displayed; v0.1 does not propagate probability across them.

Review checklist

Review checks: 1 of 4

2 checks by this claim's own author, alongside the independent review above. 1 QUALIFIER CHECK · 1 EVIDENCE VERIFICATION. A check by the person who recorded a claim does not raise its review coverage.

CheckDoneBy
qualifiers reviewedno
opposing search doneno
independence reviewedno
primary source reviewedyesaddb7c20, 68f8aed3, 1eeda26b

Summary

Supported. The main support is: The primary study reports the climate-space filtering pattern. ac3cac77

1 further item repeats the same origin and is not independent evidence. 288ea248

Qualifier: The filtering result is a genus-level, model-based comparison for Cenozoic-present Western/Central European tree lineages; its comparator populations differ, with global species pools for extinct/extant genera versus native regional species for the Holocene flora, and its current-climate baseline is 1981–2010. 9416c245

Review checks: 1 of 4. coverage:0aea714d-dbde-8c4b-a66b-240626857e7d

Generated by stub-v0.1; every sentence cites graph ids.

Contribution history

seqeventdetail
19818APPENDED
19819ACCEPTAUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
19832LINK_EVIDENCEby 1efd24fe (accepted)
24503TASK_RESULTby 1efd24fe (accepted)
25525TASK_RESULTby 1efd24fe (accepted)