Claim

In the study's fast-resource condition, groups without payoff information performed worse than solitary participants, while groups with full payoff information collected more points than solitary participants.

Type COMPARATIVE · truth-evaluable: yes · status at snapshot: ACTIVE · created seq 14964 · qualifiers {"population":"Participants in the study's online 3D resource-tracking task; comparison is limited to the tested fast-resource and payoff-sharing conditions."}

26 words; atomic claims are usually under 25a comma-separated series may list several propositions

Referenced 117 times: checked 2, looked up by assistants 0, viewed 70, shared 45. A count of attention, not evidence.

Topics

Society · 1efd24fe Psychology · 1efd24fe

Assessment

Supported

Score: 0.9781 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745

2 of 4 review checks done · 1 counted · 1 by the author only

2 independent evidence lineages · review checks 1 of 4 · stability HIGH

Main unresolved issue: 3 counted evidence items have no independence review; repeats of one origin may be counted as several coverage:0bf10e10-1d24-8177-9805-e640ac23786e

Not yet independently audited.Evidence reviewed so far supports this claim, but only 1 of 4 review checks has been done.A quoted passage from nature.com was not found on the page when Galedra fetched it.

Why?

Strongest counted support: The results passage directly compares no-payoff and full-payoff groups with solitary participants in the fast-resource condition. weight 2.000000 evidence

Suppressed as dependent: The excerpt directly reports worse performance without payoff information and better-than-solitary performance with full payoff information.

Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Supported to Supported.

Hide calculation

0.9781 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745 · state Supported · Review checks: 1 of 4 · stability HIGH · 3 sources, 2 independent lineages

Model ledger-default@0.3.0 (the default model, not the answer) · snapshot 27745 · trace sha256:6b64d6265f5d63f7e448ab3ccf2b123056194a30a7a8c1e499604a5ec1c29b4e

Last changed at entry seq 20137; nothing logged since has borne on this claim.

How the number was reached

Each counted link is weighed by multiplying the factors the model declares; a factor it does not declare is not shown. Every factor name below links to what that number means.

Link	Working	Weight	Counted as
bfe5f98c support	relevance DIRECT 2.0 × observation DIRECT_TEXT 0.9 × interpretation 0 steps, 1 − 0.15 × 0 1.000000 × authenticity UNVERIFIED 1.0 × extraction UNVERIFIED 1.0 × provenance INDEPENDENT 1.0 × edition NAMED_OR_UNRELATED 1	1.800000	1.800000
8a7bfda4 support	relevance DIRECT 2.0 × observation MEASUREMENT 1.0 × interpretation 0 steps, 1 − 0.15 × 0 1.000000 × authenticity UNVERIFIED 1.0 × extraction UNVERIFIED 1.0 × provenance INDEPENDENT 1.0 × edition NAMED_OR_UNRELATED 1	2.000000	2.000000
bf9a2cdd support	relevance DIRECT 2.0 × observation MEASUREMENT 1.0 × interpretation 0 steps, 1 − 0.15 × 0 1.000000 × authenticity UNVERIFIED 1.0 × extraction UNVERIFIED 1.0 × provenance INDEPENDENT 1.0 × edition NAMED_OR_UNRELATED 1	2.000000	0.000000 (dependent strongest only, kept 8a7bfda4)

prior 0.50 → log-odds 0.000000 + 3.800000 (the counted weights) = 3.800000 → probability 0.9781

Under neighbouring settings of the same model: 0.9346 to 0.9929, a spread of 0.0583.

Half-even rounding, six places for weights and four for the probability. The same inputs under the same model reproduce this exactly; that is what the trace hash above is for. How a score is worked out explains every factor, why it is there, and what the model sets it to.

Your view

Registered views

Nobody has registered a view yet.

Registered views are personal belief, not evidence: they never change Galedra's assessment. Affiliations are self-declared and shown only for groups of 5 or more.

Checked as part of

Statements this claim was broken out of. The claim is scored on its own; a statement's reading only counts its claims.

“In the study's fast-resource condition, groups without payoff information performed worse than solitary participants, while groups with full payoff...” · 1 claim · 29 September 2026
“A 2026 Nature Communications immersive-reality experiment tested how payoff information affects human collective tracking of a moving resource.” · 2 claims · 29 September 2026

Evidence for

The results passage directly compares no-payoff and full-payoff groups with solitary participants in the fast-resource condition.

From Payoff selectivity drives collective intelligence during dynamic resource tracking in humans Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

The results passage directly states the fast-resource comparisons.
The excerpt directly reports worse performance without payoff information and better-than-solitary performance with full payoff information.

From Payoff selectivity drives collective intelligence during dynamic resource tracking in humans Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

The passage explicitly states both fast-resource comparisons.
The primary experiment reports opposing fast-resource outcomes for groups with full payoff information and groups without payoff information.

From Payoff selectivity drives collective intelligence during dynamic resource tracking in humans Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

Independent primary behavioral result.

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

None.

Suppressed as dependent

Evidence	Group	Kept instead
7d26828f		8a7bfda4

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

None. Edges are stored and displayed; v0.1 does not propagate probability across them.

Review checklist

Review checks: 1 of 4

2 checks by this claim's own author, alongside the independent review above. 1 QUALIFIER CHECK · 1 EVIDENCE VERIFICATION. A check by the person who recorded a claim does not raise its review coverage.

Check	Done	By
qualifiers reviewed	no
opposing search done	no
independence reviewed	no
primary source reviewed	yes	bfe5f98c, 8a7bfda4, bf9a2cdd

Summary

Supported. The main support is: The primary experiment reports opposing fast-resource outcomes for groups with full payoff information and groups without payoff information. ad2b367d

1 further item repeats the same origin and is not independent evidence. 7d26828f

Review checks: 1 of 4. coverage:0bf10e10-1d24-8177-9805-e640ac23786e

Generated by stub-v0.1; every sentence cites graph ids.

Contribution history

seq	event	detail
14964	APPENDED
14965	ACCEPT	AUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
14974	LINK_EVIDENCE	by 1efd24fe (accepted)
14979	TASK_RESULT	by 1efd24fe (accepted)
20136	LINK_EVIDENCE	by 1efd24fe (accepted)

Score trace

{
  "claim": "0bf10e10-1d24-8177-9805-e640ac23786e",
  "links": [
    {
      "link": "062b2b81-587b-84b3-a4d6-bb31bfe5f98c",
      "group": null,
      "edition": "NAMED_OR_UNRELATED",
      "evidence": "9bb5366d-a988-8b9a-aee3-e78ead2b367d",
      "direction": "SUPPORT",
      "magnitude": "1.800000",
      "relevance": "DIRECT",
      "extraction": "UNVERIFIED",
      "provenance": "INDEPENDENT",
      "observation": "DIRECT_TEXT",
      "source_type": "PRIMARY_TEXT",
      "authenticity": "UNVERIFIED",
      "audit_confirmed": false,
      "effective_weight": "1.800000",
      "interpretive_steps": 0
    },
    {
      "link": "3094ef4f-a93e-855b-9d84-0cdb8a7bfda4",
      "group": null,
      "edition": "NAMED_OR_UNRELATED",
      "evidence": "35569da0-6793-8c5a-882d-c82b78fd114b",
      "direction": "SUPPORT",
      "magnitude": "2.000000",
      "relevance": "DIRECT",
      "extraction": "UNVERIFIED",
      "provenance": "INDEPENDENT",
      "observation": "MEASUREMENT",
      "source_type": "PRIMARY_TEXT",
      "authenticity": "UNVERIFIED",
      "audit_confirmed": false,
      "effective_weight": "2.000000",
      "interpretive_steps": 0
    },
    {
      "kept": "3094ef4f-a93e-855b-9d84-0cdb8a7bfda4",
      "link": "85948b0d-369a-8ded-8876-d42abf9a2cdd",
      "group": null,
      "reason": "dependent_strongest_only",
      "edition": "NAMED_OR_UNRELATED",
      "evidence": "6f62ae1c-45af-81d6-be50-634a7d26828f",
      "direction": "SUPPORT",
      "magnitude": "2.000000",
      "relevance": "DIRECT",
      "extraction": "UNVERIFIED",
      "provenance": "INDEPENDENT",
      "observation": "MEASUREMENT",
      "source_type": "PRIMARY_TEXT",
      "authenticity": "UNVERIFIED",
      "audit_confirmed": false,
      "effective_weight": "0.000000",
      "interpretive_steps": 0
    }
  ],
  "model": "ledger-default@0.3.0",
  "prior": "0.50",
  "variants": {
    "spread": "0.0583",
    "permissive": "0.9929",
    "conservative": "0.9346"
  },
  "code_hash": "sha256:c61a6fdf35a754a0d7e958df149036a083c0eaeb7d2d2e52704ec32b0c36def7",
  "contested": false,
  "stability": "HIGH",
  "claim_type": "COMPARATIVE",
  "config_hash": "sha256:86768038080b8ab5233f1e4b7aba10af05b5bb44caa432095150b90e81209809",
  "probability": "0.9781",
  "provisional": true,
  "evidence_sum": "3.800000",
  "snapshot_seq": 20137,
  "prior_log_odds": "0.000000",
  "support_groups": 2,
  "model_dependent": false,
  "review_coverage": "0.25",
  "truth_evaluable": true,
  "assessment_state": "SUPPORTED",
  "review_checklist": {
    "qualifiers_reviewed": {
      "by": [],
      "ok": false
    },
    "opposing_search_done": {
      "by": [],
      "ok": false
    },
    "independence_reviewed": {
      "by": [],
      "ok": false
    },
    "primary_source_reviewed": {
      "by": [
        "062b2b81-587b-84b3-a4d6-bb31bfe5f98c",
        "3094ef4f-a93e-855b-9d84-0cdb8a7bfda4",
        "85948b0d-369a-8ded-8876-d42abf9a2cdd"
      ],
      "ok": true
    }
  },
  "contradict_groups": 0,
  "rounding_boundary": false,
  "posterior_log_odds": "3.800000",
  "not_applicable_reason": null,
  "independence_unreviewed": 3
}