Claim

Model ledger-default@0.1.0 ledger-strict@0.1.0 ledger-default@0.2.0 ledger-strict@0.2.0 ledger-default@0.3.0 (default) ledger-strict@0.3.0 Snapshot seq

Topics

Society · 1efd24fe Psychology · 1efd24fe

Assessment

Why?

Strongest counted support: The results passage directly compares no-payoff and full-payoff groups with solitary participants in the fast-resource condition. weight 2.000000 evidence

Suppressed as dependent: The excerpt directly reports worse performance without payoff information and better-than-solitary performance with full payoff information.

Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Supported to Supported.

Show calculation

Your view

Registered views

Checked as part of

Statements this claim was broken out of. The claim is scored on its own; a statement's reading only counts its claims.

• “In the study's fast-resource condition, groups without payoff information performed worse than solitary participants, while groups with full payoff...” · 1 claim · 29 September 2026
• “A 2026 Nature Communications immersive-reality experiment tested how payoff information affects human collective tracking of a moving resource.” · 2 claims · 29 September 2026

Evidence for

• The results passage directly compares no-payoff and full-payoff groups with solitary participants in the fast-resource condition.

  From Payoff selectivity drives collective intelligence during dynamic resource tracking in humans Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

  The results passage directly states the fast-resource comparisons.

• The excerpt directly reports worse performance without payoff information and better-than-solitary performance with full payoff information.

  From Payoff selectivity drives collective intelligence during dynamic resource tracking in humans Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

  The passage explicitly states both fast-resource comparisons.

• The primary experiment reports opposing fast-resource outcomes for groups with full payoff information and groups without payoff information.

  From Payoff selectivity drives collective intelligence during dynamic resource tracking in humans Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

  Independent primary behavioral result.

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

None.

Suppressed as dependent

Evidence	Group	Kept instead
7d26828f		8a7bfda4

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

None. Edges are stored and displayed; v0.1 does not propagate probability across them.

Review checklist

Review checks: 1 of 4

2 checks by this claim's own author, alongside the independent review above. 1 QUALIFIER CHECK · 1 EVIDENCE VERIFICATION. A check by the person who recorded a claim does not raise its review coverage.

Check	Done	By
qualifiers reviewed	no
opposing search done	no
independence reviewed	no
primary source reviewed	yes	bfe5f98c, 8a7bfda4, bf9a2cdd

Summary

Contribution history

seq	event	detail
14964	APPENDED
14965	ACCEPT	AUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
14974	LINK_EVIDENCE	by 1efd24fe (accepted)
14979	TASK_RESULT	by 1efd24fe (accepted)
20136	LINK_EVIDENCE	by 1efd24fe (accepted)