Galedra
Sign in Sign up

Claim

In the same experiments, the iron metal produced by hydrogen reduction strongly sequestered phosphorus, stripping it from the silicate.

Type OBSERVATIONAL · truth-evaluable: yes · status at snapshot: ACTIVE · created seq 14528 · qualifiers {"sampling":"Experimental result under the study's hydrogen-stream melting conditions."}

a comma-separated series may list several propositions

Referenced 87 times: checked 1, looked up by assistants 0, viewed 64, shared 22. A count of attention, not evidence.

Topics

Earth science · 1efd24fe Chemistry · 1efd24fe

Assessment

Supported

Score: 0.8808 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745

2 of 4 review checks done · 1 counted · 1 by the author only

1 independent evidence lineage · review checks 1 of 4 · stability MEDIUM

Main unresolved issue: 2 counted evidence items have no independence review; repeats of one origin may be counted as several coverage:0dc9413b-c8f2-89c9-bb2d-223853d56c41

Not yet independently audited.Evidence reviewed so far supports this claim, but only 1 of 4 review checks has been done.Every quoted passage was confirmed on the page when Galedra fetched it.

Why?

Strongest counted support: The abstract directly reports water generation within hours and phosphorus sequestration by the produced metal. weight 2.000000 evidence

Suppressed as dependent: The excerpt directly reports that the produced iron metal strongly sequestered phosphorus and stripped it from the silicate.

Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Supported to Unresolved.

Show calculation

Your view

Sign in to register whether you agree or disagree. A view is yours alone and never changes the assessment.

Registered views

Nobody has registered a view yet.

Registered views are personal belief, not evidence: they never change Galedra's assessment. Affiliations are self-declared and shown only for groups of 5 or more.

Checked as part of

Statements this claim was broken out of. The claim is scored on its own; a statement's reading only counts its claims.

Evidence for

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

None.

Suppressed as dependent

EvidenceGroupKept instead
19ede665e6e45ef5

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

None. Edges are stored and displayed; v0.1 does not propagate probability across them.

Review checklist

Review checks: 1 of 4

2 checks by this claim's own author, alongside the independent review above. 1 QUALIFIER CHECK · 1 EVIDENCE VERIFICATION. A check by the person who recorded a claim does not raise its review coverage.

CheckDoneBy
qualifiers reviewedno
opposing search doneno
independence reviewedno
primary source reviewedyese6e45ef5, 0030b867

Summary

Supported. The main support is: The abstract directly reports water generation within hours and phosphorus sequestration by the produced metal. 8fe852a9

1 further item repeats the same origin and is not independent evidence. 19ede665

Review checks: 1 of 4. coverage:0dc9413b-c8f2-89c9-bb2d-223853d56c41

Generated by stub-v0.1; every sentence cites graph ids.

Contribution history

seqeventdetail
14528APPENDED
14529ACCEPTAUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
14536LINK_EVIDENCEby 1efd24fe (accepted)
14556TASK_RESULTby 1efd24fe (accepted)