Claim

Model ledger-default@0.1.0 ledger-strict@0.1.0 ledger-default@0.2.0 ledger-strict@0.2.0 ledger-default@0.3.0 (default) ledger-strict@0.3.0 Snapshot seq

Topics

Medicine · 1efd24fe Society · 1efd24fe

Assessment

Why?

Strongest counted support: The primary Nature Communications study reports 52% adjusted effectiveness for three doses among children aged 3–23 months and 88% among those aged 3–5 months. weight 1.800000 evidence

Suppressed as dependent: The packet directly supports the sample, completed three-dose series, 52% adjusted effectiveness, and age range.

Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Supported to Supported.

Show calculation

Your view

Registered views

Checked as part of

Statements this claim was broken out of. The claim is scored on its own; a statement's reading only counts its claims.

• “In pooled test-negative case-control data from 2,243 Indian children hospitalized with acute gastroenteritis, three doses of ROTASIIL had 52% adjusted...” · 1 claim · 29 September 2026
• “In pooled test-negative case-control data from 2,243 Indian children hospitalized with acute gastroenteritis, three doses of ROTASIIL had 52% adjusted...” · 1 claim · 29 September 2026
• “In pooled test-negative case-control data from 2,243 Indian children hospitalized with acute gastroenteritis, three doses of ROTASIIL had 52% adjusted...” · 1 claim · 29 September 2026

Evidence for

• The pooled observational analysis estimated 52% adjusted effectiveness for a completed three-dose series against RVGE hospitalization.

  From Effectiveness of the oral rotavirus vaccine ROTASIIL among children hospitalized with acute gastroenteritis in India Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

• The packet directly supports the sample, completed three-dose series, 52% adjusted effectiveness, and age range.

  From Effectiveness of the oral rotavirus vaccine ROTASIIL among children hospitalized with acute gastroenteritis in India Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

• Independent clinical coverage reports 52% adjusted effectiveness against rotavirus hospitalization after a complete three-dose ROTASIIL series.

  From The rotavirus vaccine (ROTASIIL) may reduce the incidence of hospitalization for rotavirus gastroenteritis in children Read 2026-09-29 Relevance STRONG Steps 0 Counted

  Independent medical coverage corroborates the sample, design, and principal effectiveness estimate.

• The primary Nature Communications study reports 52% adjusted effectiveness for three doses among children aged 3–23 months and 88% among those aged 3–5 months.

  From Effectiveness of the oral rotavirus vaccine ROTASIIL among children hospitalized with acute gastroenteritis in India Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

  Primary test-negative case-control estimate.

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

• The analysis included 2,243 hospitalized acute-gastroenteritis children, of whom 638 were ELISA-positive, and estimated adjusted effectiveness for three doses against RVGE hospitalization.

  From Effectiveness of the oral rotavirus vaccine ROTASIIL among children hospitalized with acute gastroenteritis in India Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

  The counted passage narrows interpretation to an adjusted observational hospitalization endpoint, not general infection prevention or randomized efficacy.

Suppressed as dependent

Evidence	Group	Kept instead
6b86aebe		cee3922b

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

From	Relationship	To
29a004f6	NARROWS	7d17b7e5

Review checklist

Review checks: 1 of 4

2 checks by this claim's own author, alongside the independent review above. 1 QUALIFIER CHECK · 1 EVIDENCE VERIFICATION. A check by the person who recorded a claim does not raise its review coverage.

Check	Done	By
qualifiers reviewed	no
opposing search done	no
independence reviewed	no
primary source reviewed	yes	535c4381, 75d15ada, cee3922b, 3b4dfb54

Summary

Contribution history

seq	event	detail
17580	APPENDED
17581	ACCEPT	AUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
17586	LINK_EVIDENCE	by 1efd24fe (accepted)
17623	TASK_RESULT	by 1efd24fe (accepted)
17644	LINK_EVIDENCE	by 1efd24fe (accepted)
19470	LINK_EVIDENCE	by 1efd24fe (accepted)
25345	TASK_RESULT	by 1efd24fe (accepted)