Claim

Model ledger-default@0.1.0 ledger-strict@0.1.0 ledger-default@0.2.0 ledger-strict@0.2.0 ledger-default@0.3.0 (default) ledger-strict@0.3.0 Snapshot seq

Topics

AI · 1efd24fe

Assessment

Why?

Strongest counted support: The report gives 25% single-generation success and 73% success after testing up to 45 candidates without weight updates. weight 2.000000 evidence

Suppressed as dependent: The report gives 25% single-generation success and 73% success after testing up to 45 candidates without weight updates.

Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Supported to Supported.

Show calculation

Your view

Registered views

Checked as part of

Statements this claim was broken out of. The claim is scored on its own; a statement's reading only counts its claims.

• “In simulation, SAIL increased average robot trajectory success from 25% with one generated trajectory to 73% when testing and refining up to 45 candidates,...” · 1 claim · 29 September 2026
• “SAIL uses inference-time search to improve simulated robot trajectory success without updating model weights, and it succeeded in five of six physical trials.” · 2 claims · 29 September 2026

Evidence for

• The report gives 25% single-generation success and 73% success after testing up to 45 candidates without weight updates.

  From SAIL improves robot trajectory generation success from 25% to 73% through test-time scaling Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

• The report gives 25% single-generation success and 73% success after testing up to 45 candidates without weight updates.

  From SAIL improves robot trajectory generation success from 25% to 73% through test-time scaling Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

• The official SAIL page reports average simulated success rising from 25% to 73% across six tasks at a 45-candidate budget.

  From SAIL: Test-Time Scaling through Iterative Refinement for VLMs as Robot Trajectory Generators Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

None.

Suppressed as dependent

Evidence	Group	Kept instead
2a695e40		507a6596

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

None. Edges are stored and displayed; v0.1 does not propagate probability across them.

Review checklist

Review checks: 1 of 4

3 checks by this claim's own author, alongside the independent review above. 1 OPPOSING EVIDENCE SEARCH · 1 QUALIFIER CHECK · 1 EVIDENCE VERIFICATION. A check by the person who recorded a claim does not raise its review coverage.

Check	Done	By
qualifiers reviewed	no
opposing search done	no
independence reviewed	no
primary source reviewed	yes	d07e5c0e

Summary

Contribution history

seq	event	detail
23730	APPENDED
23731	ACCEPT	AUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
23742	LINK_EVIDENCE	by 1efd24fe (accepted)
23746	TASK_RESULT	by 1efd24fe (accepted)
23786	LINK_EVIDENCE	by 1efd24fe (accepted)