Galedra
Sign in Sign up

Claim

The reported analysis found a moderate overall correlation between Roman and modern roads across the former Roman Empire, with substantial variation by location.

Type COMPARATIVE · truth-evaluable: yes · status at snapshot: ACTIVE · created seq 15235 · qualifiers {"population":"Roman and modern road networks across the former Roman Empire","denominator":"Overall network correlation, varying by location"}

a conjunction joins clauses that may be separately evaluable

Referenced 96 times: checked 1, looked up by assistants 0, viewed 73, shared 22. A count of attention, not evidence.

Topics

Ancient · 1efd24fe Statistics · 1efd24fe

Assessment

Leans supported

Score: 0.6457 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745

2 of 4 review checks done · 0 counted · 2 by the author only

1 independent evidence lineage · review checks 0 of 4 · stability MEDIUM

Main unresolved issue: 2 counted evidence items have no independence review; repeats of one origin may be counted as several coverage:2674bd93-722c-8fd2-a96b-6865b5f54b7c

Not yet independently audited.

Why?

Strongest counted support: The press release reports a moderate overall correlation between Roman and modern roads that varies considerably by location. weight 0.600000 evidence

Suppressed as dependent: The excerpt directly reports a moderate overall correlation and substantial geographic variation between Roman and modern roads.

Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed, primary source reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Leans supported to Contradicted.

Hide calculation

0.6457 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745 · state Leans supported · Review checks: 0 of 4 · stability MEDIUM · 2 sources, 1 independent lineage

Model ledger-default@0.3.0 (the default model, not the answer) · snapshot 27745 · trace sha256:7e99b025cfd4157dc537b0d516621740ef46ec78afcc46f436c3cff8a6b3bee6

Last changed at entry seq 15564; nothing logged since has borne on this claim.

How the number was reached

Each counted link is weighed by multiplying the factors the model declares; a factor it does not declare is not shown. Every factor name below links to what that number means.

LinkWorkingWeightCounted as
951d774d support relevance DIRECT 2.0 × observation EXPERT_ANALYSIS 0.3 × interpretation 0 steps, 1 − 0.15 × 0 1.000000 × authenticity UNVERIFIED 1.0 × extraction UNVERIFIED 1.0 × provenance INDEPENDENT 1.0 × edition NAMED_OR_UNRELATED 1 0.600000 0.000000 (dependent strongest only, kept 57aac51d)
57aac51d support relevance DIRECT 2.0 × observation EXPERT_ANALYSIS 0.3 × interpretation 0 steps, 1 − 0.15 × 0 1.000000 × authenticity UNVERIFIED 1.0 × extraction UNVERIFIED 1.0 × provenance INDEPENDENT 1.0 × edition NAMED_OR_UNRELATED 1 0.600000 0.600000

prior 0.50 → log-odds 0.000000 + 0.600000 (the counted weights) = 0.600000 → probability 0.6457

Under neighbouring settings of the same model: 0.6035 to 0.6857, a spread of 0.0822.

Half-even rounding, six places for weights and four for the probability. The same inputs under the same model reproduce this exactly; that is what the trace hash above is for. How a score is worked out explains every factor, why it is there, and what the model sets it to.

Your view

Sign in to register whether you agree or disagree. A view is yours alone and never changes the assessment.

Registered views

Nobody has registered a view yet.

Registered views are personal belief, not evidence: they never change Galedra's assessment. Affiliations are self-declared and shown only for groups of 5 or more.

Checked as part of

Statements this claim was broken out of. The claim is scored on its own; a statement's reading only counts its claims.

Evidence for

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

None.

Suppressed as dependent

EvidenceGroupKept instead
dac1c5ae57aac51d

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

None. Edges are stored and displayed; v0.1 does not propagate probability across them.

Review checklist

Review checks: 0 of 4

3 checks by this claim's own author. No independent review yet. 1 OPPOSING EVIDENCE SEARCH · 1 QUALIFIER CHECK · 1 EVIDENCE VERIFICATION. A check by the person who recorded a claim does not raise its review coverage.

CheckDoneBy
qualifiers reviewedno
opposing search doneno
independence reviewedno
primary source reviewedno

Summary

Leans supported. The main support is: The press release reports a moderate overall correlation between Roman and modern roads that varies considerably by location. 16dedce9

1 further item repeats the same origin and is not independent evidence. dac1c5ae

A search for evidence in the opposing direction found none. 321428d8

Review checks: 0 of 4. coverage:2674bd93-722c-8fd2-a96b-6865b5f54b7c

Generated by stub-v0.1; every sentence cites graph ids.

Contribution history

seqeventdetail
15235APPENDED
15236ACCEPTAUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
15245LINK_EVIDENCEby 1efd24fe (accepted)
15250TASK_RESULTby 1efd24fe (accepted)

Score trace

{
  "claim": "2674bd93-722c-8fd2-a96b-6865b5f54b7c",
  "links": [
    {
      "kept": "9024e31a-4fc2-8ce1-8de1-eb5a57aac51d",
      "link": "7434725c-76cb-85ef-9ea5-d124951d774d",
      "group": null,
      "reason": "dependent_strongest_only",
      "edition": "NAMED_OR_UNRELATED",
      "evidence": "9056da44-abe4-8d54-9bd3-3ba0dac1c5ae",
      "direction": "SUPPORT",
      "magnitude": "0.600000",
      "relevance": "DIRECT",
      "extraction": "UNVERIFIED",
      "provenance": "INDEPENDENT",
      "observation": "EXPERT_ANALYSIS",
      "source_type": "SECONDARY_TEXT",
      "authenticity": "UNVERIFIED",
      "audit_confirmed": false,
      "effective_weight": "0.000000",
      "interpretive_steps": 0
    },
    {
      "link": "9024e31a-4fc2-8ce1-8de1-eb5a57aac51d",
      "group": null,
      "edition": "NAMED_OR_UNRELATED",
      "evidence": "783787d8-58af-8dec-9e88-ab1c16dedce9",
      "direction": "SUPPORT",
      "magnitude": "0.600000",
      "relevance": "DIRECT",
      "extraction": "UNVERIFIED",
      "provenance": "INDEPENDENT",
      "observation": "EXPERT_ANALYSIS",
      "source_type": "SECONDARY_TEXT",
      "authenticity": "UNVERIFIED",
      "audit_confirmed": false,
      "effective_weight": "0.600000",
      "interpretive_steps": 0
    }
  ],
  "model": "ledger-default@0.3.0",
  "prior": "0.50",
  "variants": {
    "spread": "0.0822",
    "permissive": "0.6857",
    "conservative": "0.6035"
  },
  "code_hash": "sha256:c61a6fdf35a754a0d7e958df149036a083c0eaeb7d2d2e52704ec32b0c36def7",
  "contested": false,
  "stability": "MEDIUM",
  "claim_type": "COMPARATIVE",
  "config_hash": "sha256:86768038080b8ab5233f1e4b7aba10af05b5bb44caa432095150b90e81209809",
  "probability": "0.6457",
  "provisional": true,
  "evidence_sum": "0.600000",
  "snapshot_seq": 15564,
  "prior_log_odds": "0.000000",
  "support_groups": 1,
  "model_dependent": false,
  "review_coverage": "0.00",
  "truth_evaluable": true,
  "assessment_state": "LEANS_SUPPORTED",
  "review_checklist": {
    "qualifiers_reviewed": {
      "by": [],
      "ok": false
    },
    "opposing_search_done": {
      "by": [],
      "ok": false
    },
    "independence_reviewed": {
      "by": [],
      "ok": false
    },
    "primary_source_reviewed": {
      "by": [],
      "ok": false
    }
  },
  "contradict_groups": 0,
  "rounding_boundary": false,
  "posterior_log_odds": "0.600000",
  "not_applicable_reason": null,
  "independence_unreviewed": 2
}