Galedra
Sign in Sign up

Claim

The study implemented its protocol on a programmable superconducting processor realizing an interacting Su–Schrieffer–Heeger ladder.

Type OBSERVATIONAL · truth-evaluable: yes · status at snapshot: ACTIVE · created seq 20622

Referenced 99 times: checked 2, looked up by assistants 0, viewed 61, shared 36. A count of attention, not evidence.

Topics

Physics · 1efd24fe Technology · 1efd24fe

Assessment

Supported

Score: 0.8581 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745

2 of 4 review checks done · 1 counted · 1 by the author only

1 independent evidence lineage · review checks 1 of 4 · stability MEDIUM

Main unresolved issue: 3 counted evidence items have no independence review; repeats of one origin may be counted as several coverage:4c70fa43-0526-83a0-b1c4-1d8ae38c4e7f

Not yet independently audited.Evidence reviewed so far supports this claim, but only 1 of 4 review checks has been done.A quoted passage is on the page but our reader could not line it up with it, because the publisher's markup interrupts the sentence.Every quoted passage was confirmed on the page when Galedra fetched it.

Why?

Strongest counted support: The primary study identifies the processor platform and interacting model. weight 1.800000 evidence

Suppressed as dependent: The primary study identifies the processor platform and interacting model.; The excerpt directly states that the hybrid feedback scheme was implemented on a programmable superconducting qubit processor realizing an interacting SSH ladder.

Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Supported to Unresolved.

Show calculation

Your view

Sign in to register whether you agree or disagree. A view is yours alone and never changes the assessment.

Registered views

Nobody has registered a view yet.

Registered views are personal belief, not evidence: they never change Galedra's assessment. Affiliations are self-declared and shown only for groups of 5 or more.

Checked as part of

Statements this claim was broken out of. The claim is scored on its own; a statement's reading only counts its claims.

Evidence for

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

None.

Suppressed as dependent

EvidenceGroupKept instead
de90fbaeb0c74cc8
3b91a651b0c74cc8

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

None. Edges are stored and displayed; v0.1 does not propagate probability across them.

Review checklist

Review checks: 1 of 4

2 checks by this claim's own author, alongside the independent review above. 1 QUALIFIER CHECK · 1 EVIDENCE VERIFICATION. A check by the person who recorded a claim does not raise its review coverage.

CheckDoneBy
qualifiers reviewedno
opposing search doneno
independence reviewedno
primary source reviewedyes7b27c48b, b0c74cc8, 07e3359d

Summary

Supported. The main support is: The primary study identifies the processor platform and interacting model. b53aebe2

2 further items repeat the same origin and are not independent evidence. de90fbae3b91a651

Review checks: 1 of 4. coverage:4c70fa43-0526-83a0-b1c4-1d8ae38c4e7f

Generated by stub-v0.1; every sentence cites graph ids.

Contribution history

seqeventdetail
20622APPENDED
20623ACCEPTAUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
20638LINK_EVIDENCEby 1efd24fe (accepted)
20668LINK_EVIDENCEby 1efd24fe (accepted)
24528TASK_RESULTby 1efd24fe (accepted)