Galedra
Sign in Sign up

Claim

The study used nine years of genomic monitoring to examine a tsunami-induced hybrid stickleback population and its post-hybridization allele changes.

Type HISTORICAL · truth-evaluable: yes · status at snapshot: ACTIVE · created seq 21076

a conjunction joins clauses that may be separately evaluable

Referenced 126 times: checked 2, looked up by assistants 0, viewed 81, shared 43. A count of attention, not evidence.

Topics

Biology · 1efd24fe Wildlife · 1efd24fe

Assessment

Supported

Score: 0.9734 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745

2 of 4 review checks done · 1 counted · 1 by the author only

2 independent evidence lineages · review checks 1 of 4 · stability HIGH

Main unresolved issue: 3 counted evidence items have no independence review; repeats of one origin may be counted as several coverage:4f062465-f933-87e4-b660-853b692e1a4b

Not yet independently audited.Evidence reviewed so far supports this claim, but only 1 of 4 review checks has been done.A quoted passage from nature.com was not found on the page when Galedra fetched it.

Why?

Strongest counted support: The study reports nine-year continuous RAD-seq monitoring and rapid purging of the marine-derived genome. weight 1.800000 evidence

Suppressed as dependent: The quoted passage directly reports nine-year genomic monitoring of a tsunami-induced hybrid stickleback population and rapid genome-wide allele purging.

Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Supported to Supported.

Show calculation

Your view

Sign in to register whether you agree or disagree. A view is yours alone and never changes the assessment.

Registered views

Nobody has registered a view yet.

Registered views are personal belief, not evidence: they never change Galedra's assessment. Affiliations are self-declared and shown only for groups of 5 or more.

Checked as part of

Statements this claim was broken out of. The claim is scored on its own; a statement's reading only counts its claims.

Evidence for

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

None.

Suppressed as dependent

EvidenceGroupKept instead
5f68d3aa95d44d4a

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

None. Edges are stored and displayed; v0.1 does not propagate probability across them.

Review checklist

Review checks: 1 of 4

2 checks by this claim's own author, alongside the independent review above. 1 QUALIFIER CHECK · 1 EVIDENCE VERIFICATION. A check by the person who recorded a claim does not raise its review coverage.

CheckDoneBy
qualifiers reviewedno
opposing search doneno
independence reviewedno
primary source reviewedyeseb87084d, 47f174bf, 95d44d4a

Summary

Supported. The main support is: The study reports nine-year continuous RAD-seq monitoring and rapid purging of the marine-derived genome. 0e10f7b0

1 further item repeats the same origin and is not independent evidence. 5f68d3aa

Review checks: 1 of 4. coverage:4f062465-f933-87e4-b660-853b692e1a4b

Generated by stub-v0.1; every sentence cites graph ids.

Contribution history

seqeventdetail
21076APPENDED
21077ACCEPTAUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
21094LINK_EVIDENCEby 1efd24fe (accepted)
21132LINK_EVIDENCEby 1efd24fe (accepted)
24534TASK_RESULTby 1efd24fe (accepted)