Claim

Model ledger-default@0.1.0 ledger-strict@0.1.0 ledger-default@0.2.0 ledger-strict@0.2.0 ledger-default@0.3.0 (default) ledger-strict@0.3.0 Snapshot seq

Topics

Medicine · 1efd24fe AI · 1efd24fe

Assessment

Why?

Strongest counted support: The primary study reports the model’s training and validation scale. weight 1.800000 evidence

Suppressed as dependent: The quoted passage directly reports EAGLE training on 6,813 patients and validation across 12 centers in three countries involving 80,612 patients.

Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Supported to Supported.

Show calculation

Your view

Registered views

Checked as part of

Statements this claim was broken out of. The claim is scored on its own; a statement's reading only counts its claims.

• “The EAGLE model was trained on 6,813 patients and validated across 12 centers in three countries involving 80,612 patients.” · 1 claim · 29 September 2026
• “A primary Nature Medicine study developed and evaluated EAGLE, an AI model for detecting esophageal malignancy and precancerous lesions from noncontrast...” · 3 claims · 29 September 2026

Evidence for

• The primary study reports the model’s training and validation scale.

  From Large-scale esophageal cancer screening through noncontrast computed tomography and artificial intelligence Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

  Primary dataset description.

• The primary study directly reports the model’s training and validation scale.

  From Large-scale esophageal cancer screening through noncontrast computed tomography and artificial intelligence Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

  Additional direct evidence for the newly created scale claim.

• The quoted passage directly reports EAGLE training on 6,813 patients and validation across 12 centers in three countries involving 80,612 patients.

  From Large-scale esophageal cancer screening through noncontrast computed tomography and artificial intelligence Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

  The excerpt states all numerical training and validation details.

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

None.

Suppressed as dependent

Evidence	Group	Kept instead
c8ab7caa		61846523

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

None. Edges are stored and displayed; v0.1 does not propagate probability across them.

Review checklist

Review checks: 1 of 4

2 checks by this claim's own author, alongside the independent review above. 1 QUALIFIER CHECK · 1 EVIDENCE VERIFICATION. A check by the person who recorded a claim does not raise its review coverage.

Check	Done	By
qualifiers reviewed	no
opposing search done	no
independence reviewed	no
primary source reviewed	yes	61846523, c44ea865, 3179a3de

Summary

Contribution history

seq	event	detail
20812	APPENDED
20813	ACCEPT	AUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
20830	LINK_EVIDENCE	by 1efd24fe (accepted)
20915	LINK_EVIDENCE	by 1efd24fe (accepted)
24530	TASK_RESULT	by 1efd24fe (accepted)