Claim

The EAGLE model was trained on 6,813 patients and validated across 12 centers in three countries involving 80,612 patients.

Type QUANTITATIVE · truth-evaluable: yes · status at snapshot: ACTIVE · created seq 20812

a conjunction joins clauses that may be separately evaluablea comma-separated series may list several propositions

Referenced 132 times: checked 2, looked up by assistants 0, viewed 86, shared 44. A count of attention, not evidence.

Topics

Medicine · 1efd24fe AI · 1efd24fe

Assessment

Supported

Score: 0.9734 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745

2 of 4 review checks done · 1 counted · 1 by the author only

2 independent evidence lineages · review checks 1 of 4 · stability HIGH

Main unresolved issue: 3 counted evidence items have no independence review; repeats of one origin may be counted as several coverage:505e39ef-171f-8358-aaf1-ecfc966e932b

Not yet independently audited.Evidence reviewed so far supports this claim, but only 1 of 4 review checks has been done.A quoted passage from nature.com was not found on the page when Galedra fetched it.

Why?

Strongest counted support: The primary study reports the model’s training and validation scale. weight 1.800000 evidence

Suppressed as dependent: The quoted passage directly reports EAGLE training on 6,813 patients and validation across 12 centers in three countries involving 80,612 patients.

Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Supported to Supported.

Hide calculation

0.9734 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745 · state Supported · Review checks: 1 of 4 · stability HIGH · 3 sources, 2 independent lineages

Model ledger-default@0.3.0 (the default model, not the answer) · snapshot 27745 · trace sha256:fb397600eaf8929ca0e19bf60d8d12df75c58d9bd1e56cbff24ed4ce704cc69d

Last changed at entry seq 25562; nothing logged since has borne on this claim.

How the number was reached

Each counted link is weighed by multiplying the factors the model declares; a factor it does not declare is not shown. Every factor name below links to what that number means.

Link	Working	Weight	Counted as
61846523 support	relevance DIRECT 2.0 × observation DATASET_RESULT 0.9 × interpretation 0 steps, 1 − 0.15 × 0 1.000000 × authenticity UNVERIFIED 1.0 × extraction UNVERIFIED 1.0 × provenance INDEPENDENT 1.0 × edition NAMED_OR_UNRELATED 1	1.800000	1.800000
c44ea865 support	relevance DIRECT 2.0 × observation DIRECT_TEXT 0.9 × interpretation 0 steps, 1 − 0.15 × 0 1.000000 × authenticity UNVERIFIED 1.0 × extraction UNVERIFIED 1.0 × provenance INDEPENDENT 1.0 × edition NAMED_OR_UNRELATED 1	1.800000	1.800000
3179a3de support	relevance DIRECT 2.0 × observation DIRECT_TEXT 0.9 × interpretation 0 steps, 1 − 0.15 × 0 1.000000 × authenticity UNVERIFIED 1.0 × extraction UNVERIFIED 1.0 × provenance INDEPENDENT 1.0 × edition NAMED_OR_UNRELATED 1	1.800000	0.000000 (dependent strongest only, kept 61846523)

prior 0.50 → log-odds 0.000000 + 3.600000 (the counted weights) = 3.600000 → probability 0.9734

Under neighbouring settings of the same model: 0.9255 to 0.9908, a spread of 0.0653.

Half-even rounding, six places for weights and four for the probability. The same inputs under the same model reproduce this exactly; that is what the trace hash above is for. How a score is worked out explains every factor, why it is there, and what the model sets it to.

Your view

Registered views

Nobody has registered a view yet.

Registered views are personal belief, not evidence: they never change Galedra's assessment. Affiliations are self-declared and shown only for groups of 5 or more.

Checked as part of

Statements this claim was broken out of. The claim is scored on its own; a statement's reading only counts its claims.

“The EAGLE model was trained on 6,813 patients and validated across 12 centers in three countries involving 80,612 patients.” · 1 claim · 29 September 2026
“A primary Nature Medicine study developed and evaluated EAGLE, an AI model for detecting esophageal malignancy and precancerous lesions from noncontrast...” · 3 claims · 29 September 2026

Evidence for

The primary study reports the model’s training and validation scale.

From Large-scale esophageal cancer screening through noncontrast computed tomography and artificial intelligence Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

Primary dataset description.
The primary study directly reports the model’s training and validation scale.

From Large-scale esophageal cancer screening through noncontrast computed tomography and artificial intelligence Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

Additional direct evidence for the newly created scale claim.
The quoted passage directly reports EAGLE training on 6,813 patients and validation across 12 centers in three countries involving 80,612 patients.

From Large-scale esophageal cancer screening through noncontrast computed tomography and artificial intelligence Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

The excerpt states all numerical training and validation details.

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

None.

Suppressed as dependent

Evidence	Group	Kept instead
c8ab7caa		61846523

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

None. Edges are stored and displayed; v0.1 does not propagate probability across them.

Review checklist

Review checks: 1 of 4

2 checks by this claim's own author, alongside the independent review above. 1 QUALIFIER CHECK · 1 EVIDENCE VERIFICATION. A check by the person who recorded a claim does not raise its review coverage.

Check	Done	By
qualifiers reviewed	no
opposing search done	no
independence reviewed	no
primary source reviewed	yes	61846523, c44ea865, 3179a3de

Summary

Supported. The main support is: The primary study reports the model’s training and validation scale. d740f445

1 further item repeats the same origin and is not independent evidence. c8ab7caa

Review checks: 1 of 4. coverage:505e39ef-171f-8358-aaf1-ecfc966e932b

Generated by stub-v0.1; every sentence cites graph ids.

Contribution history

seq	event	detail
20812	APPENDED
20813	ACCEPT	AUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
20830	LINK_EVIDENCE	by 1efd24fe (accepted)
20915	LINK_EVIDENCE	by 1efd24fe (accepted)
24530	TASK_RESULT	by 1efd24fe (accepted)

Score trace

{
  "claim": "505e39ef-171f-8358-aaf1-ecfc966e932b",
  "links": [
    {
      "link": "b6013577-ce11-8c77-9a90-6cb561846523",
      "group": null,
      "edition": "NAMED_OR_UNRELATED",
      "evidence": "082ab3a0-9fa2-8886-adbf-20d1d740f445",
      "direction": "SUPPORT",
      "magnitude": "1.800000",
      "relevance": "DIRECT",
      "extraction": "UNVERIFIED",
      "provenance": "INDEPENDENT",
      "observation": "DATASET_RESULT",
      "source_type": "PRIMARY_TEXT",
      "authenticity": "UNVERIFIED",
      "audit_confirmed": false,
      "effective_weight": "1.800000",
      "interpretive_steps": 0
    },
    {
      "link": "e50de1db-08ff-8628-95ef-c0acc44ea865",
      "group": null,
      "edition": "NAMED_OR_UNRELATED",
      "evidence": "f9797112-0ea3-8f5e-a5a4-5bfd9f379c80",
      "direction": "SUPPORT",
      "magnitude": "1.800000",
      "relevance": "DIRECT",
      "extraction": "UNVERIFIED",
      "provenance": "INDEPENDENT",
      "observation": "DIRECT_TEXT",
      "source_type": "PRIMARY_TEXT",
      "authenticity": "UNVERIFIED",
      "audit_confirmed": false,
      "effective_weight": "1.800000",
      "interpretive_steps": 0
    },
    {
      "kept": "b6013577-ce11-8c77-9a90-6cb561846523",
      "link": "fc3b7fd4-92de-80b4-b005-d1003179a3de",
      "group": null,
      "reason": "dependent_strongest_only",
      "edition": "NAMED_OR_UNRELATED",
      "evidence": "b09eccf7-693a-882c-9f4e-22eac8ab7caa",
      "direction": "SUPPORT",
      "magnitude": "1.800000",
      "relevance": "DIRECT",
      "extraction": "UNVERIFIED",
      "provenance": "INDEPENDENT",
      "observation": "DIRECT_TEXT",
      "source_type": "PRIMARY_TEXT",
      "authenticity": "UNVERIFIED",
      "audit_confirmed": false,
      "effective_weight": "0.000000",
      "interpretive_steps": 0
    }
  ],
  "model": "ledger-default@0.3.0",
  "prior": "0.50",
  "variants": {
    "spread": "0.0653",
    "permissive": "0.9908",
    "conservative": "0.9255"
  },
  "code_hash": "sha256:c61a6fdf35a754a0d7e958df149036a083c0eaeb7d2d2e52704ec32b0c36def7",
  "contested": false,
  "stability": "HIGH",
  "claim_type": "QUANTITATIVE",
  "config_hash": "sha256:86768038080b8ab5233f1e4b7aba10af05b5bb44caa432095150b90e81209809",
  "probability": "0.9734",
  "provisional": true,
  "evidence_sum": "3.600000",
  "snapshot_seq": 25562,
  "prior_log_odds": "0.000000",
  "support_groups": 2,
  "model_dependent": false,
  "review_coverage": "0.25",
  "truth_evaluable": true,
  "assessment_state": "SUPPORTED",
  "review_checklist": {
    "qualifiers_reviewed": {
      "by": [],
      "ok": false
    },
    "opposing_search_done": {
      "by": [],
      "ok": false
    },
    "independence_reviewed": {
      "by": [],
      "ok": false
    },
    "primary_source_reviewed": {
      "by": [
        "b6013577-ce11-8c77-9a90-6cb561846523",
        "e50de1db-08ff-8628-95ef-c0acc44ea865",
        "fc3b7fd4-92de-80b4-b005-d1003179a3de"
      ],
      "ok": true
    }
  },
  "contradict_groups": 0,
  "rounding_boundary": false,
  "posterior_log_odds": "3.600000",
  "not_applicable_reason": null,
  "independence_unreviewed": 3
}