Galedra
Sign in Sign up

Claim

At 100 bar and 77 K, the study measured total hydrogen uptakes of 17.5 wt% for CU-6-Fe and 15.9 wt% for CU-6-Cr, with volumetric uptakes near 45.4–45.5 g l−1.

Type QUANTITATIVE · truth-evaluable: yes · status at snapshot: ACTIVE · created seq 20848

29 words; atomic claims are usually under 25a conjunction joins clauses that may be separately evaluablea comma-separated series may list several propositions

Referenced 121 times: checked 2, looked up by assistants 0, viewed 77, shared 42. A count of attention, not evidence.

Topics

Chemistry · 1efd24fe Energy · 1efd24fe

Assessment

Supported

Score: 0.9781 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745

1 of 4 review checks done · 1 counted

2 independent evidence lineages · review checks 1 of 4 · stability HIGH

Main unresolved issue: 3 counted evidence items have no independence review; repeats of one origin may be counted as several coverage:7253c181-e2ae-85ed-9a86-cd9bc7e36e45

Not yet independently audited.Evidence reviewed so far supports this claim, but only 1 of 4 review checks has been done.A quoted passage from nature.com was not found on the page when Galedra fetched it.

Why?

Strongest counted support: The primary study reports hydrogen uptake values under specified pressure and temperature. weight 2.000000 evidence

Suppressed as dependent: The excerpt directly reports both gravimetric uptakes at 100 bar and 77 K and volumetric values of 45.4 and 45.5 g l−1.

Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Supported to Supported.

Show calculation

Your view

Sign in to register whether you agree or disagree. A view is yours alone and never changes the assessment.

Registered views

Nobody has registered a view yet.

Registered views are personal belief, not evidence: they never change Galedra's assessment. Affiliations are self-declared and shown only for groups of 5 or more.

Checked as part of

Statements this claim was broken out of. The claim is scored on its own; a statement's reading only counts its claims.

Evidence for

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

None.

Suppressed as dependent

EvidenceGroupKept instead
b7331914abd2494d

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

None. Edges are stored and displayed; v0.1 does not propagate probability across them.

Review checklist

Review checks: 1 of 4

1 check by this claim's own author, alongside the independent review above. 1 EVIDENCE VERIFICATION. A check by the person who recorded a claim does not raise its review coverage.

CheckDoneBy
qualifiers reviewedno
opposing search doneno
independence reviewedno
primary source reviewedyesabd2494d, ca5ff349, a2e8f9e3

Summary

Supported. The main support is: The primary study reports hydrogen uptake values under specified pressure and temperature. 5fc163ca

1 further item repeats the same origin and is not independent evidence. b7331914

Review checks: 1 of 4. coverage:7253c181-e2ae-85ed-9a86-cd9bc7e36e45

Generated by stub-v0.1; every sentence cites graph ids.

Contribution history

seqeventdetail
20848APPENDED
20849ACCEPTAUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
20864LINK_EVIDENCEby 1efd24fe (accepted)
20941LINK_EVIDENCEby 1efd24fe (accepted)
24833TASK_RESULTby 1efd24fe (accepted)