Galedra
Sign in Sign up

Claim

Within marine ecosystems, species asynchrony was the strongest predictor of fish-mediated nutrient-dynamics stability, with higher synchrony associated with destabilization.

Type COMPARATIVE · truth-evaluable: yes · status at snapshot: ACTIVE · created seq 19349 · qualifiers {"population":"Fish communities across coral reef, mangrove, seagrass, and kelp ecosystems; within-ecosystem analysis of biomass fluctuations."}

a comma-separated series may list several propositions

Referenced 112 times: checked 2, looked up by assistants 0, viewed 72, shared 38. A count of attention, not evidence.

Topics

Biology · 1efd24fe Wildlife · 1efd24fe

Assessment

Supported

Score: 0.9487 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745

2 of 4 review checks done · 1 counted · 1 by the author only

2 independent evidence lineages · review checks 1 of 4 · stability HIGH

Main unresolved issue: 4 counted evidence items have no independence review; repeats of one origin may be counted as several coverage:738a7e9e-1fb1-83c7-9ba6-013695b23702

Not yet independently audited.Evidence reviewed so far supports this claim, but only 1 of 4 review checks has been done.Every quoted passage was confirmed on the page when Galedra fetched it.

Why?

Strongest counted support: The PNAS abstract identifies species asynchrony as the strongest within-ecosystem driver and reports higher synchrony destabilizing nutrient dynamics. weight 2.000000 evidence

Suppressed as dependent: The passage identifies species asynchrony as the most important within-ecosystem stability driver and states that higher synchrony destabilizes nutrient dynamics.

Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Supported to Leans supported.

Hide calculation

0.9487 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745 · state Supported · Review checks: 1 of 4 · stability HIGH · 4 sources, 2 independent lineages

Model ledger-default@0.3.0 (the default model, not the answer) · snapshot 27745 · trace sha256:8db7280b2c55d35abf427f4ee978adde99d1df9d8b6b3780f50593cac046d5d2

Last changed at entry seq 25960; nothing logged since has borne on this claim.

How the number was reached

Each counted link is weighed by multiplying the factors the model declares; a factor it does not declare is not shown. Every factor name below links to what that number means.

LinkWorkingWeightCounted as
c81ec3d2 qualify relevance DIRECT 2.0 × observation DIRECT_TEXT 0.9 × interpretation 0 steps, 1 − 0.15 × 0 1.000000 × authenticity UNVERIFIED 1.0 × extraction UNVERIFIED 1.0 × provenance INDEPENDENT 1.0 × edition NAMED_OR_UNRELATED 1 1.800000 0.000000 (non directional)
f9e4727c support relevance DIRECT 2.0 × observation MEASUREMENT 1.0 × interpretation 0 steps, 1 − 0.15 × 0 1.000000 × authenticity UNVERIFIED 1.0 × extraction UNVERIFIED 1.0 × provenance INDEPENDENT 1.0 × edition NAMED_OR_UNRELATED 1 2.000000 2.000000
43845a38 support relevance STRONG 1.2 × observation DIRECT_TEXT 0.9 × interpretation 1 step, 1 − 0.15 × 1 0.850000 × authenticity UNVERIFIED 1.0 × extraction UNVERIFIED 1.0 × provenance INDEPENDENT 1.0 × edition NAMED_OR_UNRELATED 1 0.918000 0.918000
730d932d support relevance DIRECT 2.0 × observation DIRECT_TEXT 0.9 × interpretation 0 steps, 1 − 0.15 × 0 1.000000 × authenticity UNVERIFIED 1.0 × extraction UNVERIFIED 1.0 × provenance INDEPENDENT 1.0 × edition NAMED_OR_UNRELATED 1 1.800000 0.000000 (dependent strongest only, kept f9e4727c)

prior 0.50 → log-odds 0.000000 + 2.918000 (the counted weights) = 2.918000 → probability 0.9487

Under neighbouring settings of the same model: 0.8852 to 0.9780, a spread of 0.0928.

Half-even rounding, six places for weights and four for the probability. The same inputs under the same model reproduce this exactly; that is what the trace hash above is for. How a score is worked out explains every factor, why it is there, and what the model sets it to.

Your view

Sign in to register whether you agree or disagree. A view is yours alone and never changes the assessment.

Registered views

Nobody has registered a view yet.

Registered views are personal belief, not evidence: they never change Galedra's assessment. Affiliations are self-declared and shown only for groups of 5 or more.

Checked as part of

Statements this claim was broken out of. The claim is scored on its own; a statement's reading only counts its claims.

Evidence for

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

Suppressed as dependent

EvidenceGroupKept instead
f5f7cc8cf9e4727c

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

None. Edges are stored and displayed; v0.1 does not propagate probability across them.

Review checklist

Review checks: 1 of 4

2 checks by this claim's own author, alongside the independent review above. 1 QUALIFIER CHECK · 1 EVIDENCE VERIFICATION. A check by the person who recorded a claim does not raise its review coverage.

CheckDoneBy
qualifiers reviewedno
opposing search doneno
independence reviewedno
primary source reviewedyesc81ec3d2, f9e4727c, 730d932d

Summary

Supported. The main support is: The PNAS abstract identifies species asynchrony as the strongest within-ecosystem driver and reports higher synchrony destabilizing nutrient dynamics. e458c44a

1 further item repeats the same origin and is not independent evidence. f5f7cc8c

Qualifier: The asynchrony result is bounded to six monitoring programs, 146 marine time series from 1999–2023, and nitrogen supply via fish excretion. 7605fb01

Review checks: 1 of 4. coverage:738a7e9e-1fb1-83c7-9ba6-013695b23702

Generated by stub-v0.1; every sentence cites graph ids.

Contribution history

seqeventdetail
19349APPENDED
19350ACCEPTAUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
19359LINK_EVIDENCEby 1efd24fe (accepted)
19367LINK_EVIDENCEby 1efd24fe (accepted)
24767TASK_RESULTby 1efd24fe (accepted)
25959TASK_RESULTby 1efd24fe (accepted)

Score trace

{
  "claim": "738a7e9e-1fb1-83c7-9ba6-013695b23702",
  "links": [
    {
      "link": "5829f4e4-cede-8976-bdad-26dec81ec3d2",
      "group": null,
      "reason": "non_directional",
      "edition": "NAMED_OR_UNRELATED",
      "evidence": "48ae82e6-1619-8b0b-820a-64397605fb01",
      "direction": "QUALIFY",
      "magnitude": "1.800000",
      "relevance": "DIRECT",
      "extraction": "UNVERIFIED",
      "provenance": "INDEPENDENT",
      "observation": "DIRECT_TEXT",
      "source_type": "PRIMARY_TEXT",
      "authenticity": "UNVERIFIED",
      "audit_confirmed": false,
      "effective_weight": "0.000000",
      "interpretive_steps": 0
    },
    {
      "link": "bbf28cca-adc1-82e2-8a3f-35c9f9e4727c",
      "group": null,
      "edition": "NAMED_OR_UNRELATED",
      "evidence": "87197ef2-e397-8766-af72-a488e458c44a",
      "direction": "SUPPORT",
      "magnitude": "2.000000",
      "relevance": "DIRECT",
      "extraction": "UNVERIFIED",
      "provenance": "INDEPENDENT",
      "observation": "MEASUREMENT",
      "source_type": "PRIMARY_TEXT",
      "authenticity": "UNVERIFIED",
      "audit_confirmed": false,
      "effective_weight": "2.000000",
      "interpretive_steps": 0
    },
    {
      "link": "c15a2a28-ba71-82fa-b9d7-cba843845a38",
      "group": null,
      "edition": "NAMED_OR_UNRELATED",
      "evidence": "83a86280-baf0-8a3c-9267-e31e21d0edc2",
      "direction": "SUPPORT",
      "magnitude": "0.918000",
      "relevance": "STRONG",
      "extraction": "UNVERIFIED",
      "provenance": "INDEPENDENT",
      "observation": "DIRECT_TEXT",
      "source_type": "SECONDARY_TEXT",
      "authenticity": "UNVERIFIED",
      "audit_confirmed": false,
      "effective_weight": "0.918000",
      "interpretive_steps": 1
    },
    {
      "kept": "bbf28cca-adc1-82e2-8a3f-35c9f9e4727c",
      "link": "c22f41fc-59d4-8eeb-b481-60ea730d932d",
      "group": null,
      "reason": "dependent_strongest_only",
      "edition": "NAMED_OR_UNRELATED",
      "evidence": "fb7ab6b9-0d84-87f4-b349-7949f5f7cc8c",
      "direction": "SUPPORT",
      "magnitude": "1.800000",
      "relevance": "DIRECT",
      "extraction": "UNVERIFIED",
      "provenance": "INDEPENDENT",
      "observation": "DIRECT_TEXT",
      "source_type": "PRIMARY_TEXT",
      "authenticity": "UNVERIFIED",
      "audit_confirmed": false,
      "effective_weight": "0.000000",
      "interpretive_steps": 0
    }
  ],
  "model": "ledger-default@0.3.0",
  "prior": "0.50",
  "variants": {
    "spread": "0.0928",
    "permissive": "0.9780",
    "conservative": "0.8852"
  },
  "code_hash": "sha256:c61a6fdf35a754a0d7e958df149036a083c0eaeb7d2d2e52704ec32b0c36def7",
  "contested": false,
  "stability": "HIGH",
  "claim_type": "COMPARATIVE",
  "config_hash": "sha256:86768038080b8ab5233f1e4b7aba10af05b5bb44caa432095150b90e81209809",
  "probability": "0.9487",
  "provisional": true,
  "evidence_sum": "2.918000",
  "snapshot_seq": 25960,
  "prior_log_odds": "0.000000",
  "support_groups": 2,
  "model_dependent": false,
  "review_coverage": "0.25",
  "truth_evaluable": true,
  "assessment_state": "SUPPORTED",
  "review_checklist": {
    "qualifiers_reviewed": {
      "by": [],
      "ok": false
    },
    "opposing_search_done": {
      "by": [],
      "ok": false
    },
    "independence_reviewed": {
      "by": [],
      "ok": false
    },
    "primary_source_reviewed": {
      "by": [
        "5829f4e4-cede-8976-bdad-26dec81ec3d2",
        "bbf28cca-adc1-82e2-8a3f-35c9f9e4727c",
        "c22f41fc-59d4-8eeb-b481-60ea730d932d"
      ],
      "ok": true
    }
  },
  "contradict_groups": 0,
  "rounding_boundary": false,
  "posterior_log_odds": "2.918000",
  "not_applicable_reason": null,
  "independence_unreviewed": 4
}