Claim

Model ledger-default@0.1.0 ledger-strict@0.1.0 ledger-default@0.2.0 ledger-strict@0.2.0 ledger-default@0.3.0 (default) ledger-strict@0.3.0 Snapshot seq

Topics

Earth science · 1efd24fe Chemistry · 1efd24fe

Assessment

Why?

Strongest counted support: The excerpt reports ε100Ru-based fCI below approximately 0.3 percent and ε48Ca-based fCI below approximately 2 percent in the bulk silicate Earth/bulk Earth context. weight 1.800000 evidence

Suppressed as dependent: The primary study reports upper bounds from its CI mass-balance tests.

Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Supported to Unresolved.

Show calculation

Your view

Registered views

Checked as part of

Statements this claim was broken out of. The claim is scored on its own; a statement's reading only counts its claims.

• “A multivariate isotope analysis examined the provenance of Earth’s bulk silicate composition across ten nucleosynthetic isotope anomalies.” · 3 claims · 29 September 2026

Evidence for

• The primary study reports upper bounds from its CI mass-balance tests.

  From Homogeneous accretion of the Earth in the inner Solar System Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

  Primary mass-balance calculations.

• The excerpt reports ε100Ru-based fCI below approximately 0.3 percent and ε48Ca-based fCI below approximately 2 percent in the bulk silicate Earth/bulk Earth context.

  From Homogeneous accretion of the Earth in the inner Solar System Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

  The passage directly supports both element-specific upper bounds and the BSE setting.

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

• The quoted bounds include Ru ±0.1% and Ca ±0.2% uncertainties, and calcium distinguishes BSE from bulk-Earth scope.

  From Homogeneous accretion of the Earth in the inner Solar System Read 2026-09-29 Relevance MODERATE Steps 0 Counted

  The headline rounds bounds and omits their uncertainties and calcium reservoir distinction.

Suppressed as dependent

Evidence	Group	Kept instead
c6f9f077		1d7ac882

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

None. Edges are stored and displayed; v0.1 does not propagate probability across them.

Review checklist

Review checks: 1 of 4

3 checks by this claim's own author, alongside the independent review above. 1 OPPOSING EVIDENCE SEARCH · 1 QUALIFIER CHECK · 1 EVIDENCE VERIFICATION. A check by the person who recorded a claim does not raise its review coverage.

Check	Done	By
qualifiers reviewed	no
opposing search done	no
independence reviewed	no
primary source reviewed	yes	6e64bcb1, 20675a8c, 1d7ac882

Summary

Contribution history

seq	event	detail
19957	APPENDED
19958	ACCEPT	AUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
19971	LINK_EVIDENCE	by 1efd24fe (accepted)
24130	TASK_RESULT	by 1efd24fe (accepted)
25034	TASK_RESULT	by 1efd24fe (accepted)