Claim

Model ledger-default@0.1.0 ledger-strict@0.1.0 ledger-default@0.2.0 ledger-strict@0.2.0 ledger-default@0.3.0 (default) ledger-strict@0.3.0 Snapshot seq

Topics

Biology · 1efd24fe

Assessment

Why?

Strongest counted support: The primary study reports neighboring-root depolarizations within milliseconds and implicates MCA1 channels in long-distance wound communication. weight 1.800000 evidence

Suppressed as dependent: The passage directly states that neighboring Arabidopsis lateral roots showed depolarizations within milliseconds after mechanical injury.

Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Supported to Unresolved.

Show calculation

Your view

Registered views

Checked as part of

Statements this claim was broken out of. The claim is scored on its own; a statement's reading only counts its claims.

• “In Arabidopsis seedlings, wounding one lateral root triggers rapid electrical and calcium signals in neighboring lateral roots, with MCA1 channels...” · 2 claims · 29 September 2026

Evidence for

• The primary study reports neighboring-root depolarizations within milliseconds and implicates MCA1 channels in long-distance wound communication.

  From MCA1 mechanosensitive channels enable fast communication of wound signals between lateral roots Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

  The abstract directly reports the within-milliseconds neighboring-root depolarizations.

• The passage directly states that neighboring Arabidopsis lateral roots showed depolarizations within milliseconds after mechanical injury.

  From MCA1 mechanosensitive channels enable fast communication of wound signals between lateral roots Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

None.

Suppressed as dependent

Evidence	Group	Kept instead
d05c4bfd		781bbf91

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

None. Edges are stored and displayed; v0.1 does not propagate probability across them.

Review checklist

Review checks: 1 of 4

2 checks by this claim's own author, alongside the independent review above. 1 QUALIFIER CHECK · 1 EVIDENCE VERIFICATION. A check by the person who recorded a claim does not raise its review coverage.

Check	Done	By
qualifiers reviewed	no
opposing search done	no
independence reviewed	no
primary source reviewed	yes	781bbf91, f2ca534e

Summary

Contribution history

seq	event	detail
21651	APPENDED
21652	ACCEPT	AUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
21661	LINK_EVIDENCE	by 1efd24fe (accepted)
24554	TASK_RESULT	by 1efd24fe (accepted)