Galedra
Sign in Sign up

Claim

At the same event Trump announced that all 50 states had signed on to a most-favored-nation program to lower prescription drug prices.

Type HISTORICAL · truth-evaluable: yes · status at snapshot: ACTIVE · created seq 5748

Referenced 107 times: checked 1, looked up by assistants 0, viewed 65, shared 41. A count of attention, not evidence.

Topics

Health · e82bf250 Policy · e82bf250

Assessment

Supported

Score: 0.8581 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745

3 of 4 review checks done · 3 counted

1 independent evidence lineage · review checks 3 of 4 · stability MEDIUM

Main unresolved issue: 3 counted evidence items have no independence review; repeats of one origin may be counted as several coverage:7df0f2f4-eb4f-8c62-86ba-c043543c6467

Not yet independently audited.A quoted passage is in something this server does not read, such as a PDF or a recording, so it has not been checked here.

Why?

Strongest counted support: A reporter described the program as 50-state participation in most-favored-nation drug deals, and Trump said every state signed up. weight 1.800000 evidence

Suppressed as dependent: The excerpt describes 50-state participation in most-favored-nation drug deals intended to lower prescription prices, and Trump says all states signed up.

Review gaps: independence reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Supported to Unresolved.

Show calculation

Your view

Sign in to register whether you agree or disagree. A view is yours alone and never changes the assessment.

Registered views

Nobody has registered a view yet.

Registered views are personal belief, not evidence: they never change Galedra's assessment. Affiliations are self-declared and shown only for groups of 5 or more.

Checked as part of

Statements this claim was broken out of. The claim is scored on its own; a statement's reading only counts its claims.

Evidence for

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

Suppressed as dependent

EvidenceGroupKept instead
6d6ad3e714f43e68

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

None. Edges are stored and displayed; v0.1 does not propagate probability across them.

Review checklist

Review checks: 3 of 4

CheckDoneBy
qualifiers reviewedyes1ccab6b0
opposing search doneyes48ad79a4
independence reviewedno
primary source reviewedyesd31c59d6, 0fc565ec, 14f43e68

Summary

Supported. The main support is: A reporter described the program as 50-state participation in most-favored-nation drug deals, and Trump said every state signed up. b9928f24

1 further item repeats the same origin and is not independent evidence. 6d6ad3e7

Qualifier: The reporter described 50-state participation, while Trump replied that the Democrats had signed up. 0300a07e

A search for evidence in the opposing direction found none. 48ad79a4

Review checks: 3 of 4. coverage:7df0f2f4-eb4f-8c62-86ba-c043543c6467

Generated by stub-v0.1; every sentence cites graph ids.

Contribution history

seqeventdetail
5748APPENDED
5749ACCEPTAUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
5850LINK_EVIDENCEby e82bf250 (accepted)
8900TASK_RESULTby 1efd24fe (accepted)
9273TASK_RESULTby 1efd24fe (accepted)