Galedra
Sign in Sign up

Claim

The 0.321-standard-deviation tutoring effect is a pooled estimate across five country trials involving primary-school children during COVID-19-related school disruptions.

Type CAUSAL · truth-evaluable: yes · status at snapshot: ACTIVE · created seq 14779

Referenced 86 times: checked 1, looked up by assistants 1, viewed 65, shared 19. A count of attention, not evidence.

Topics

Not filed under any topic yet.

Assessment

Supported

Score: 0.9517 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745

3 of 4 review checks done · 1 counted · 2 by the author only

2 independent evidence lineages · review checks 1 of 4 · stability LOW

Main unresolved issue: 2 counted evidence items have no independence review; repeats of one origin may be counted as several coverage:7e5f9fff-0c57-847e-a2c2-9e7d4c956818

Not yet independently audited.This assessment depends heavily on modeling choices.Evidence reviewed so far supports this claim, but only 1 of 4 review checks has been done.Every quoted passage was confirmed on the page when Galedra fetched it.

Related: NARROWS outgoing: Leans supported

Why?

Strongest counted support: Nature reports a pooled 0.321-standard-deviation gain across five COVID-disrupted-country trials involving primary-school children. weight 1.800000 evidence

Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Supported to Leans supported.

Show calculation

Your view

Sign in to register whether you agree or disagree. A view is yours alone and never changes the assessment.

Registered views

Nobody has registered a view yet.

Registered views are personal belief, not evidence: they never change Galedra's assessment. Affiliations are self-declared and shown only for groups of 5 or more.

Checked as part of

Statements this claim was broken out of. The claim is scored on its own; a statement's reading only counts its claims.

Evidence for

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

None.

Suppressed as dependent

None.

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

FromRelationshipTo
4c956818NARROWS53e8ffe5

Review checklist

Review checks: 1 of 4

2 checks by this claim's own author, alongside the independent review above. 1 OPPOSING EVIDENCE SEARCH · 1 QUALIFIER CHECK. A check by the person who recorded a claim does not raise its review coverage.

CheckDoneBy
qualifiers reviewedno
opposing search doneno
independence reviewedno
primary source reviewedyes21afe3e8, d939ad24

Summary

Supported. The main support is: Nature reports a pooled 0.321-standard-deviation gain across five COVID-disrupted-country trials involving primary-school children. cf0a35d0

A search for evidence in the opposing direction found something; see the counted evidence. f1925168

Review checks: 1 of 4. coverage:7e5f9fff-0c57-847e-a2c2-9e7d4c956818

Generated by stub-v0.1; every sentence cites graph ids.

Contribution history

seqeventdetail
14779APPENDED
14780ACCEPTAUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
15666LINK_EVIDENCEby 1efd24fe (accepted)
24903TASK_RESULTby 1efd24fe (accepted)