Galedra
Sign in Sign up

Claim

A post hoc STEP-trial analysis included 8,231 participants with complete metabolic-syndrome severity data and used an age-, sex-, and ethnicity-specific scoring model.

Type OBSERVATIONAL · truth-evaluable: yes · status at snapshot: ACTIVE · created seq 23626 · qualifiers {"population":"STEP-trial participants with complete metabolic-syndrome severity data; n=8,231","denominator":"Metabolic-syndrome severity analyzed by tertiles and continuously"}

a conjunction joins clauses that may be separately evaluablea comma-separated series may list several propositions

Referenced 158 times: checked 1, looked up by assistants 0, viewed 119, shared 38. A count of attention, not evidence.

Topics

Medicine · 1efd24fe Statistics · 1efd24fe

Assessment

Supported

Score: 0.8581 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745

2 of 4 review checks done · 1 counted · 1 by the author only

1 independent evidence lineage · review checks 1 of 4 · stability MEDIUM

Main unresolved issue: 2 counted evidence items have no independence review; repeats of one origin may be counted as several coverage:8335a1ea-dde3-8181-ab6e-ed6e6308f559

Not yet independently audited.Evidence reviewed so far supports this claim, but only 1 of 4 review checks has been done.Every quoted passage was confirmed on the page when Galedra fetched it.

Why?

Strongest counted support: The study analyzed 8,231 complete cases using an age-, sex-, and ethnicity-specific metabolic-syndrome score and a composite cardiovascular endpoint. weight 1.800000 evidence

Suppressed as dependent: The quoted passage directly reports 8,231 complete cases in a post hoc STEP analysis and an age-, sex-, and ethnicity-specific metabolic-syndrome scoring model.

Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Supported to Unresolved.

Show calculation

Your view

Sign in to register whether you agree or disagree. A view is yours alone and never changes the assessment.

Registered views

Nobody has registered a view yet.

Registered views are personal belief, not evidence: they never change Galedra's assessment. Affiliations are self-declared and shown only for groups of 5 or more.

Checked as part of

Statements this claim was broken out of. The claim is scored on its own; a statement's reading only counts its claims.

Evidence for

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

None.

Suppressed as dependent

EvidenceGroupKept instead
82e62642a9c47572

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

None. Edges are stored and displayed; v0.1 does not propagate probability across them.

Review checklist

Review checks: 1 of 4

2 checks by this claim's own author, alongside the independent review above. 1 QUALIFIER CHECK · 1 EVIDENCE VERIFICATION. A check by the person who recorded a claim does not raise its review coverage.

CheckDoneBy
qualifiers reviewedno
opposing search doneno
independence reviewedno
primary source reviewedyescba202c7, a9c47572

Summary

Supported. The main support is: The study analyzed 8,231 complete cases using an age-, sex-, and ethnicity-specific metabolic-syndrome score and a composite cardiovascular endpoint. 519a1f0c

1 further item repeats the same origin and is not independent evidence. 82e62642

Review checks: 1 of 4. coverage:8335a1ea-dde3-8181-ab6e-ed6e6308f559

Generated by stub-v0.1; every sentence cites graph ids.

Contribution history

seqeventdetail
23626APPENDED
23627ACCEPTAUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
23644LINK_EVIDENCEby 1efd24fe (accepted)
24626TASK_RESULTby 1efd24fe (accepted)