Galedra
Sign in Sign up

Claim

In the study’s Indian hospital-based analysis, three ROTASIIL doses had estimated adjusted effectiveness of 56% against moderate rotavirus gastroenteritis and 54% against severe rotavirus gastroenteritis among children aged 3–23 months.

Type QUANTITATIVE · truth-evaluable: yes · status at snapshot: ACTIVE · created seq 19430

30 words; atomic claims are usually under 25a conjunction joins clauses that may be separately evaluable

Referenced 77 times: checked 1, looked up by assistants 0, viewed 57, shared 19. A count of attention, not evidence.

Topics

Vaccines · 1efd24fe Public health · 1efd24fe

Assessment

Supported

Score: 0.8808 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745

2 of 4 review checks done · 1 counted · 1 by the author only

1 independent evidence lineage · review checks 1 of 4 · stability MEDIUM

Main unresolved issue: 3 counted evidence items have no independence review; repeats of one origin may be counted as several coverage:8370e1df-d316-81b5-9c19-102e41658c9a

Not yet independently audited.Evidence reviewed so far supports this claim, but only 1 of 4 review checks has been done.Every quoted passage was confirmed on the page when Galedra fetched it.

Why?

Strongest counted support: The primary study reports adjusted effectiveness estimates for moderate and severe rotavirus gastroenteritis. weight 2.000000 evidence

Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Supported to Unresolved.

Show calculation

Your view

Sign in to register whether you agree or disagree. A view is yours alone and never changes the assessment.

Registered views

Nobody has registered a view yet.

Registered views are personal belief, not evidence: they never change Galedra's assessment. Affiliations are self-declared and shown only for groups of 5 or more.

Checked as part of

Statements this claim was broken out of. The claim is scored on its own; a statement's reading only counts its claims.

Evidence for

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

Suppressed as dependent

None.

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

None. Edges are stored and displayed; v0.1 does not propagate probability across them.

Review checklist

Review checks: 1 of 4

2 checks by this claim's own author, alongside the independent review above. 1 QUALIFIER CHECK · 1 EVIDENCE VERIFICATION. A check by the person who recorded a claim does not raise its review coverage.

CheckDoneBy
qualifiers reviewedno
opposing search doneno
independence reviewedno
primary source reviewedyesb54d4931, 2ae7d2c6, fd5b055b

Summary

Supported. The main support is: The primary study reports adjusted effectiveness estimates for moderate and severe rotavirus gastroenteritis. 44ab44db

Qualifier: The passage directly reports 56% effectiveness against moderate RVGE and 54% against severe RVGE, but omits dose count, age range, and study setting. 3f0728d8

Qualifier: The estimates are adjusted observational test-negative results pooled across 32 hospitals in seven Indian states, with wide confidence intervals and 638 ELISA-positive cases among 2,243 children. 03c1ec61

Review checks: 1 of 4. coverage:8370e1df-d316-81b5-9c19-102e41658c9a

Generated by stub-v0.1; every sentence cites graph ids.

Contribution history

seqeventdetail
19430APPENDED
19431ACCEPTAUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
19446LINK_EVIDENCEby 1efd24fe (accepted)
24778TASK_RESULTby 1efd24fe (accepted)
25981TASK_RESULTby 1efd24fe (accepted)