Claim

In the U.S. oncology-trial analysis, ZIP codes in the lowest median-income tercile had significantly lower trial success rates than ZIP codes in the middle and highest income terciles; the lowest-versus-highest comparison reported p < 0.0001 and OR 1.13 [1.10–1.16].

Type QUANTITATIVE · truth-evaluable: yes · status at snapshot: ACTIVE · created seq 16662 · qualifiers {"location":"United States","comparison":"lowest versus middle/highest income terciles","population":"ZIP codes hosting oncology trials","sample_size":"15,658 trials","source_edition":"e727eaad-005a-8796-a5ec-5231b3783bf2"}

39 words; atomic claims are usually under 25a conjunction joins clauses that may be separately evaluable

Referenced 86 times: checked 1, looked up by assistants 0, viewed 65, shared 20. A count of attention, not evidence.

Topics

Medicine · 1efd24fe Society · 1efd24fe

Assessment

Supported

Score: 0.8581 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745

3 of 4 review checks done · 1 counted · 2 by the author only

1 independent evidence lineage · review checks 1 of 4 · stability MEDIUM

Main unresolved issue: 2 counted evidence items have no independence review; repeats of one origin may be counted as several coverage:859ef10c-0967-8d35-91fb-87fb694ea995

Not yet independently audited.Evidence reviewed so far supports this claim, but only 1 of 4 review checks has been done.Every quoted passage was confirmed on the page when Galedra fetched it.

Why?

Strongest counted support: The lowest-income tercile had significantly lower success rates, with the lowest-versus-highest comparison p < 0.0001 and OR 1.13 [1.10–1.16]. weight 1.800000 evidence

Suppressed as dependent: The passage directly reports lower success in low-income ZIP-code terciles and the stated p-value and odds ratio comparison.

Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Supported to Unresolved.

Show calculation

Your view

Registered views

Nobody has registered a view yet.

Registered views are personal belief, not evidence: they never change Galedra's assessment. Affiliations are self-declared and shown only for groups of 5 or more.

Checked as part of

Statements this claim was broken out of. The claim is scored on its own; a statement's reading only counts its claims.

“A U.S. oncology-trial analysis found trial locations were skewed away from lower-income ZIP codes and that trials in the lowest-income tercile had lower...” · 2 claims · 29 September 2026

Evidence for

The lowest-income tercile had significantly lower success rates, with the lowest-versus-highest comparison p < 0.0001 and OR 1.13 [1.10–1.16].

From Success rates of American clinical oncology trials by geographic factors Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted
The passage directly reports lower success in low-income ZIP-code terciles and the stated p-value and odds ratio comparison.

From Success rates of American clinical oncology trials by geographic factors Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

None.

Suppressed as dependent

Evidence	Group	Kept instead
33ea9727		a947d422

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

None. Edges are stored and displayed; v0.1 does not propagate probability across them.

Review checklist

Review checks: 1 of 4

3 checks by this claim's own author, alongside the independent review above. 1 OPPOSING EVIDENCE SEARCH · 1 QUALIFIER CHECK · 1 EVIDENCE VERIFICATION. A check by the person who recorded a claim does not raise its review coverage.

Check	Done	By
qualifiers reviewed	no
opposing search done	no
independence reviewed	no
primary source reviewed	yes	a947d422, f547f5a3

Summary

Supported. The main support is: The lowest-income tercile had significantly lower success rates, with the lowest-versus-highest comparison p < 0.0001 and OR 1.13 [1.10–1.16]. 113e4be3

1 further item repeats the same origin and is not independent evidence. 33ea9727

A search for evidence in the opposing direction found none. 9f32b910

Review checks: 1 of 4. coverage:859ef10c-0967-8d35-91fb-87fb694ea995

Generated by stub-v0.1; every sentence cites graph ids.

Contribution history

seq	event	detail
16662	APPENDED
16663	ACCEPT	AUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
16672	LINK_EVIDENCE	by 1efd24fe (accepted)
16676	TASK_RESULT	by 1efd24fe (accepted)