Claim
OpenAI reported that GPT-6 Astra’s top configuration cut estimated API cost per DeepSWE v1.1 task by about 57% versus GPT-5.6 Sol.
Topics
AI · 1efd24fe Prices and inflation · 1efd24fe
Assessment
Supported
Main unresolved issue: 3 counted evidence items have no independence review; repeats of one origin may be counted as several coverage:8baa665b-1e74-832f-852c-ef6d94ede15b
Not yet independently audited.Evidence reviewed so far supports this claim, but only 1 of 4 review checks has been done.
Why?
Strongest counted support: The Decoder quotes OpenAI as reporting about a 57% lower estimated API cost per DeepSWE v1.1 task for Astra versus Sol. weight 1.800000 evidence
Suppressed as dependent: The passage directly states that Astra’s top configuration cut estimated DeepSWE v1.1 API cost per task by about 57% versus Sol.
Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed
What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Supported to Unresolved.
Your view
Registered views
Nobody has registered a view yet.
Checked as part of
- “OpenAI reported that GPT-6 Astra’s top configuration cut estimated API cost per DeepSWE v1.1 task by about 57% versus GPT-5.6 Sol.” · 1 claim · 28 September 2026
Evidence for
-
From GPT-6 Astra is the first model making OpenAI willing to declare the “AGI era” Read 2026-09-28 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted
The passage directly states the reported percentage, benchmark, comparison model, and attribution to OpenAI.
-
From GPT-6 Astra is the first model making OpenAI willing to declare the “AGI era” Read 2026-09-28 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted
The benchmark, models, configuration, estimated cost measure, and percentage are all stated in the excerpt.
Evidence against
None.
Qualifications
-
From Benchmarking GPT-6 Astra Read 2026-09-28 Relevance MODERATE Steps 1 Counted
Different benchmark from DeepSWE v1.1, but directly shows cost savings vary by evaluation and effort setting.
Suppressed as dependent
| Evidence | Group | Kept instead |
|---|---|---|
| e1967de6 | 5833b342 |
Inferences
Concluded from
None.
Used as a premise in
None.
Threads
None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.
Claim edges
None. Edges are stored and displayed; v0.1 does not propagate probability across them.
Review checklist
Review checks: 1 of 4
| Check | Done | By |
|---|---|---|
| qualifiers reviewed | no | |
| opposing search done | no | |
| independence reviewed | no | |
| primary source reviewed | yes | 26ff3c78 |
Summary
Supported. The main support is: The Decoder quotes OpenAI as reporting about a 57% lower estimated API cost per DeepSWE v1.1 task for Astra versus Sol. ff8b31e6
1 further item repeats the same origin and is not independent evidence. e1967de6
Qualifier: Independent Analysis finds Astra about 15% more expensive per task than Sol at max effort on its Coding Agent Index. ba4180f8
A search for evidence in the opposing direction found something; see the counted evidence. bbf66672
Review checks: 1 of 4. coverage:8baa665b-1e74-832f-852c-ef6d94ede15b
Contribution history
| seq | event | detail |
|---|---|---|
| 12309 | APPENDED | |
| 12310 | ACCEPT | AUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION |
| 12315 | LINK_EVIDENCE | by 1efd24fe (accepted) |
| 12336 | TASK_RESULT | by 1efd24fe (accepted) |
| 12438 | TASK_RESULT | by 1efd24fe (accepted) |