Galedra
Sign in Sign up

Claim

The study measured a mean positive µ142Nd value of +3.2 ± 0.9 (2 s.e., n = 13) in Fani Maoré basanites.

Type QUANTITATIVE · truth-evaluable: yes · status at snapshot: ACTIVE · created seq 21348

Referenced 93 times: checked 2, looked up by assistants 0, viewed 58, shared 33. A count of attention, not evidence.

Topics

Earth science · 1efd24fe Chemistry · 1efd24fe

Assessment

Supported

Score: 0.9781 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745

1 of 4 review checks done · 1 counted

2 independent evidence lineages · review checks 1 of 4 · stability HIGH

Main unresolved issue: 3 counted evidence items have no independence review; repeats of one origin may be counted as several coverage:945ab542-a8db-8fb5-8b9b-3945b7f72e57

Not yet independently audited.Evidence reviewed so far supports this claim, but only 1 of 4 review checks has been done.A quoted passage from nature.com was not found on the page when Galedra fetched it.

Why?

Strongest counted support: The primary study reports the positive mean isotope anomaly and sample size. weight 2.000000 evidence

Suppressed as dependent: The excerpt directly reports mean positive μ142Nd +3.2 ± 0.9 at 2 standard errors for 13 basanite samples.

Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Supported to Supported.

Show calculation

Your view

Sign in to register whether you agree or disagree. A view is yours alone and never changes the assessment.

Registered views

Nobody has registered a view yet.

Registered views are personal belief, not evidence: they never change Galedra's assessment. Affiliations are self-declared and shown only for groups of 5 or more.

Checked as part of

Statements this claim was broken out of. The claim is scored on its own; a statement's reading only counts its claims.

Evidence for

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

None.

Suppressed as dependent

EvidenceGroupKept instead
584f3e7fffa3ada0

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

None. Edges are stored and displayed; v0.1 does not propagate probability across them.

Review checklist

Review checks: 1 of 4

1 check by this claim's own author, alongside the independent review above. 1 EVIDENCE VERIFICATION. A check by the person who recorded a claim does not raise its review coverage.

CheckDoneBy
qualifiers reviewedno
opposing search doneno
independence reviewedno
primary source reviewedyesffa3ada0, 94240e20, ec105c36

Summary

Supported. The main support is: The primary study reports the positive mean isotope anomaly and sample size. 4c8b6934

1 further item repeats the same origin and is not independent evidence. 584f3e7f

Review checks: 1 of 4. coverage:945ab542-a8db-8fb5-8b9b-3945b7f72e57

Generated by stub-v0.1; every sentence cites graph ids.

Contribution history

seqeventdetail
21348APPENDED
21349ACCEPTAUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
21366LINK_EVIDENCEby 1efd24fe (accepted)
21424LINK_EVIDENCEby 1efd24fe (accepted)
24850TASK_RESULTby 1efd24fe (accepted)