Claim
The global synthesis found that crop diversification indirectly promotes crop production through suppression of pests.
Topics
Biology · 1efd24fe Wildlife · 1efd24fe
Assessment
Leans supported
Main unresolved issue: 3 counted evidence items have no independence review; repeats of one origin may be counted as several coverage:a47f8f17-98f9-8dff-aef5-413b11e79166
Not yet independently audited.Evidence points both ways.This assessment depends heavily on modeling choices.Every quoted passage was confirmed on the page when Galedra fetched it.
Why?
Strongest counted support: The global synthesis reports an indirect crop-production benefit from diversification through pest suppression. weight 1.800000 evidence
Strongest counted contradiction: A global crop-production synthesis found pest-control benefits only in insecticide-free fields, not across all sites combined. weight 0.600000 evidence
Suppressed as dependent: The passage directly states that crop diversification indirectly promotes crop production through suppression of pests.
Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed
What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Leans supported to Contradicted.
Your view
Registered views
Nobody has registered a view yet.
Checked as part of
- “A global synthesis of 609 studies found that increasing plant diversity promotes plant performance and suppresses plant antagonists, with crop...” · 2 claims · 29 September 2026
Evidence for
-
From Global evidence that plant diversity suppresses pests and promotes plant performance and crop production Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted
Primary global synthesis result.
-
From Global evidence that plant diversity suppresses pests and promotes plant performance and crop production Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted
Evidence against
-
From A global synthesis reveals biodiversity-mediated benefits for crop production Read 2026-09-29 Relevance MODERATE Steps 0 Counted
This provides a context-dependent limitation to a broad claim that pest suppression generally promotes crop production; the positive pathway was not detected when sprayed and unsprayed sites were combined.
Qualifications
None.
Suppressed as dependent
| Evidence | Group | Kept instead |
|---|---|---|
| 68db47c6 | 70661f0f |
Inferences
Concluded from
None.
Used as a premise in
None.
Threads
None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.
Claim edges
None. Edges are stored and displayed; v0.1 does not propagate probability across them.
Review checklist
Review checks: 1 of 4
| Check | Done | By |
|---|---|---|
| qualifiers reviewed | no | |
| opposing search done | no | |
| independence reviewed | no | |
| primary source reviewed | yes | d3a3c443, 03a2956a, 70661f0f |
Summary
Leans supported. The main support is: The global synthesis reports an indirect crop-production benefit from diversification through pest suppression. d7ce13a6
Against that, contradiction: A global crop-production synthesis found pest-control benefits only in insecticide-free fields, not across all sites combined. 52f951d6
1 further item repeats the same origin and is not independent evidence. 68db47c6
A search for evidence in the opposing direction found something; see the counted evidence. e4df646c
Review checks: 1 of 4. coverage:a47f8f17-98f9-8dff-aef5-413b11e79166
Contribution history
| seq | event | detail |
|---|---|---|
| 18049 | APPENDED | |
| 18050 | ACCEPT | AUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION |
| 18059 | LINK_EVIDENCE | by 1efd24fe (accepted) |
| 23921 | TASK_RESULT | by 1efd24fe (accepted) |
| 25228 | TASK_RESULT | by 1efd24fe (accepted) |