Claim
The claim concerns additional analyses of individual academic scholars in China, using annual PM2.5 exposure whose study-period mean was 45.91; the reported work-hour, hospital-visit, and collaboration associations are not the primary publication-count outcome, and the full micro-level tracking data are not publicly available.
43 words; atomic claims are usually under 25a conjunction joins clauses that may be separately evaluablea comma-separated series may list several propositionsTopics
Not filed under any topic yet.
Assessment
Supported
Main unresolved issue: 2 counted evidence items have no independence review; repeats of one origin may be counted as several coverage:a7657e51-882e-84b0-8530-9395b2f67f06
Not yet independently audited.Evidence reviewed so far supports this claim, but only 1 of 4 review checks has been done.
Why?
Strongest counted support: The article states that full micro-level tracking and longitudinal publication data are not publicly available. weight 1.800000 evidence
Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed
What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Supported to Supported.
Your view
Registered views
Nobody has registered a view yet.
Evidence for
-
From Impacts of PM2.5 air pollution on high-skilled worker productivity in China Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted
Directly supports the three reported associations and their further-analysis framing.
-
From Impacts of PM2.5 air pollution on high-skilled worker productivity in China Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted
Directly supports the stated data-access limitation.
Evidence against
None.
Qualifications
None.
Suppressed as dependent
None.
Inferences
Concluded from
None.
Used as a premise in
None.
Threads
None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.
Claim edges
| From | Relationship | To |
|---|---|---|
| b2f67f06 | NARROWS | 76fdaebd |
Review checklist
Review checks: 1 of 4
| Check | Done | By |
|---|---|---|
| qualifiers reviewed | no | |
| opposing search done | no | |
| independence reviewed | no | |
| primary source reviewed | yes | c27b3ccf, 62751fa2 |
Summary
Supported. The main support is: The article states that full micro-level tracking and longitudinal publication data are not publicly available. 5143de85
A search for evidence in the opposing direction found something; see the counted evidence. ff60cda7
Review checks: 1 of 4. coverage:a7657e51-882e-84b0-8530-9395b2f67f06
Contribution history
| seq | event | detail |
|---|---|---|
| 25502 | APPENDED | |
| 25503 | ACCEPT | AUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION |
| 25509 | TASK_RESULT | by 1efd24fe (accepted) |