Galedra
Sign in Sign up

Claim

In the reported study, the perovskite solar devices retained 93.3% of their initial efficiency after 1000 hours of maximum-power-point tracking.

Type QUANTITATIVE · truth-evaluable: yes · status at snapshot: ACTIVE · created seq 15133 · qualifiers {"population":"Reported perovskite solar devices","time_range":"1000 hours of maximum-power-point tracking","denominator":"Retention of initial efficiency"}

Referenced 80 times: checked 1, looked up by assistants 0, viewed 59, shared 20. A count of attention, not evidence.

Topics

Energy · 1efd24fe Chemistry · 1efd24fe

Assessment

Supported

Score: 0.8808 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745

2 of 4 review checks done · 1 counted · 1 by the author only

1 independent evidence lineage · review checks 1 of 4 · stability MEDIUM

Main unresolved issue: 2 counted evidence items have no independence review; repeats of one origin may be counted as several coverage:aa8f5774-0330-888c-a5db-d292b344e333

Not yet independently audited.Evidence reviewed so far supports this claim, but only 1 of 4 review checks has been done.Every quoted passage was confirmed on the page when Galedra fetched it.

Why?

Strongest counted support: The abstract reports 93.3% retention of initial efficiency after 1000 hours of maximum-power-point tracking. weight 2.000000 evidence

Suppressed as dependent: The excerpt directly reports 93.3% retention of initial efficiency after 1000 hours of maximum-power-point tracking.

Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Supported to Unresolved.

Show calculation

Your view

Sign in to register whether you agree or disagree. A view is yours alone and never changes the assessment.

Registered views

Nobody has registered a view yet.

Registered views are personal belief, not evidence: they never change Galedra's assessment. Affiliations are self-declared and shown only for groups of 5 or more.

Checked as part of

Statements this claim was broken out of. The claim is scored on its own; a statement's reading only counts its claims.

Evidence for

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

None.

Suppressed as dependent

EvidenceGroupKept instead
4f1b77120ca98580

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

None. Edges are stored and displayed; v0.1 does not propagate probability across them.

Review checklist

Review checks: 1 of 4

2 checks by this claim's own author, alongside the independent review above. 1 QUALIFIER CHECK · 1 EVIDENCE VERIFICATION. A check by the person who recorded a claim does not raise its review coverage.

CheckDoneBy
qualifiers reviewedno
opposing search doneno
independence reviewedno
primary source reviewedyes0ca98580, da7463b6

Summary

Supported. The main support is: The abstract reports 93.3% retention of initial efficiency after 1000 hours of maximum-power-point tracking. eebe3f1a

1 further item repeats the same origin and is not independent evidence. 4f1b7712

Review checks: 1 of 4. coverage:aa8f5774-0330-888c-a5db-d292b344e333

Generated by stub-v0.1; every sentence cites graph ids.

Contribution history

seqeventdetail
15133APPENDED
15134ACCEPTAUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
15143LINK_EVIDENCEby 1efd24fe (accepted)
15147TASK_RESULTby 1efd24fe (accepted)